tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post3998118889608218311..comments2024-03-29T11:13:00.338+00:00Comments on Ambush Predator: Trim That Bush, Citizen!JuliaMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-34483398724483212892010-08-28T15:49:55.120+01:002010-08-28T15:49:55.120+01:00"Is it, though? Once the original complainant..."Is it, though? Once the original complainant has moved away, does that not mean that it should be reviewed?"<br /><br />Maybe, but until such time as it HAS been reviewed, he should abide by the order. Or face the consequences. Possibly his new neighbour may have views that need to be taken into account during that review.KenSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-27422099089381374152010-08-28T05:42:27.693+01:002010-08-28T05:42:27.693+01:00"His claim the the original complainant has m...<i>"His claim the the original complainant has moved (to somewhere with daylight?)is irrelevant."</i> <br /><br />Is it, though? Once the original complainant has moved away, does that not mean that it should be reviewed?<br /><br /><i>"Never believe anything anyone who works for the State says. Get everything in writing..."</i><br /><br />I always do, for just this reason!JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-21052748447936491472010-08-27T11:23:24.974+01:002010-08-27T11:23:24.974+01:00Never believe anything anyone who works for the St...Never believe anything anyone who works for the State says. Get everything in writing (which they probably won't do anyway, so assume the worst). Then you have some sort of evidence to fight them with. Your word against theirs - we know who'll get believed there don't we?sobersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-83661229548695560622010-08-27T10:26:54.562+01:002010-08-27T10:26:54.562+01:00Sorry, not got much sympathy on this one. Johnston...Sorry, not got much sympathy on this one. Johnston has an order requiring him to keep his hedge below nineteen feet high. He ignored it. He's been fined.<br /><br />His claim the the original complainant has moved (to somewhere with daylight?)is irrelevant. It's between Johnston and the court, or Johnston and the council, not Johnston and his erstwhile neighbour.KenSnoreply@blogger.com