tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post4954359237666352977..comments2024-03-28T18:32:00.146+00:00Comments on Ambush Predator: 'Not A Violent Young Man'...JuliaMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-67718376496152725242009-06-24T17:05:18.313+01:002009-06-24T17:05:18.313+01:00"I expect the lawyer meant first conviction f...<i>"I expect the lawyer meant first conviction for a violent offence, and tried to pretend other criminality somehow didn't count."</i> <br /><br />Ah, no, there's actually TWO of these scumbags - one with a preious conviction, one without.JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-46754437882922713482009-06-24T13:48:57.353+01:002009-06-24T13:48:57.353+01:00The way things were in Britain when I left I'm...The way things were in Britain when I left I'm surprised he was remanded and amazed he got more than a cursory time already served sentence. But one thing I noticed might explain it:<br><br><i>“This is his <b>first conviction</b> and he pleaded guilty at the first opportunity.”</i><br>...and...<br><i>Lee, who has previous convictions...</i><br><br>I expect the lawyer meant first conviction for a violent offence, and tried to pretend other criminality somehow didn't count. That might be why the judge wasn't swayed enough to let him off with a non custodial sentence. As far as the sentence itself goes, if he really is turning over a new leaf it's probably about right I think. If it's a ploy for a soft sentence then the little shit's playing the system perfectly. Unfortunately only time will tell, but if it turns out to be the latter the next judge needs to throw the fucking book at him.Angry Exilehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02491082312193274360noreply@blogger.com