tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post5718514038840093563..comments2024-03-28T18:32:00.146+00:00Comments on Ambush Predator: It Take A Village (Person) To Raise A Child….JuliaMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-28645093872335565772009-02-01T12:36:00.000+00:002009-02-01T12:36:00.000+00:00Campaign resources (ie contacts) for this awful ca...Campaign resources (ie contacts) for this awful case here, if you want to make a fuss.<BR/><BR/>http://citizensandneighbours.blogspot.com/2009/02/edinburgh-adoption-row-2009.htmlNorth Northwesterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12389201453703172394noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-38157621970863167722009-01-30T18:19:00.000+00:002009-01-30T18:19:00.000+00:00Hi. Does anyone know of any campaigns or campaigni...Hi. Does anyone know of any campaigns or campaigning groups that deal with this kind of Big Brother family-destruction that the Marxists are about? Ones akin to Families Need Fathers or the Campaign for Real Education? If so, please send me links to their sites, etc at Britaincando@yahoo.co.uk so I can publicise them here: <BR/><BR/>http://citizensandneighbours.blogspot.com/2009/01/campaigns-and-campaigners.html <BR/><BR/>Or post them on the site.<BR/>(Shameless plug.)North Northwesterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10990919627286136085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-54538652165470864182009-01-30T17:34:00.000+00:002009-01-30T17:34:00.000+00:00I feel for you in your current predicament. It mus...<I>I feel for you in your current predicament. It must be difficult not knowing which prejudice should trump which.<BR/><BR/>....<BR/><BR/>If so, I'd be interested to know what you think makes a generic homosexual couple less suitable to raise these children than a generic heterosexual couple.</I><BR/><BR/>Yeah nice try liberal, now back in your box.<BR/><BR/>The coercion is the deal breaker. If they try and fight it they get no visitation rights. Why is that then? The two things are unrelated. Its blatant, naked aggression. Evil in fact.<BR/><BR/>Would that coercion be applied where it a gay couple trying to keep a natural relative vs adoption to a straight couple? Of course not and you know it.<BR/><BR/>As for them pulling this s**t on a muslim family, no chance.<BR/><BR/>The SS turds have got form on this sort of thing - lest we forget <A HREF="http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/How-neighbours39-attitudes-to-39pleasant39.1518953.jp" REL="nofollow">Craig Faunch</A>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-79727001101790716352009-01-29T11:26:00.000+00:002009-01-29T11:26:00.000+00:00The BBC during the PM programme yeaterday, unbiase...The BBC during the PM programme yeaterday, unbiased as always, said that the Catholic Church was "stirring up controversy" when they criticised the decision.<BR/><BR/>Nice choice of phrase there. Not loaded at all. Perfectly neutral. They use it all the time to describe the interventions of race hustlers, equality thugs, etc.Furry Conservativehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15840687073409523262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-3395294788590988672009-01-29T07:20:00.000+00:002009-01-29T07:20:00.000+00:00I'm furious about this. Children should stay with ...I'm furious about this. Children should stay with family wherever possible. It's cruel! They should take it to the court of human rights, as I consider this a breach.<BR/><BR/>If social services don't think the grandparents are able to cope, then they should provide them with help when they need it. The righteous will bend over backwards to help anyone else!<BR/><BR/>It's not lifetime care we talking of here, kids do grow up into adults eventually!Suehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07165615283953837706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-65240088743738377382009-01-29T00:33:00.000+00:002009-01-29T00:33:00.000+00:00Social Services kidnapping children for the sake o...Social Services kidnapping children for the sake of homosexual equality.<BR/><BR/>This is why tolerating homosexuality, as "normal" is wrong.Homophobic Horsehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05358511824189191231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-3606022814724034002009-01-28T20:41:00.000+00:002009-01-28T20:41:00.000+00:00No Henry, they haven't.They're just a shower of ba...No Henry, they haven't.<BR/><BR/>They're just a shower of bastards.<BR/><BR/>Oh and I'm not surprised the grandparents are in poor health with the strain of this hanging over them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-17853709358278477272009-01-28T19:15:00.000+00:002009-01-28T19:15:00.000+00:0059 and 46? Thats not old at allHave Social servic...59 and 46? Thats not old at all<BR/><BR/>Have Social services gone completely barmy?Henry North London 2.0https://www.blogger.com/profile/14748991488145468593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-34846948044571452942009-01-28T18:16:00.000+00:002009-01-28T18:16:00.000+00:00"They have used threats against an elderly couple ...<I>"They have used threats against an elderly couple in order to obtain subjects for their experiments. "</I><BR/><BR/>Threats to <A HREF="http://thylacosmilus.blogspot.com/2009/01/hippocratic-oath-needs-updating.html" REL="nofollow">get people to comply</A> with the position of the moment seem to be <I>de rigueur</I> lately, with the State, don't they..?JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-79636978456741827502009-01-28T18:08:00.000+00:002009-01-28T18:08:00.000+00:00Anon: why go for the prejudice angle? Why go for t...Anon: why go for the prejudice angle? <BR/><BR/>Why go for the irrelevance of comparing a homosexual foster couple to a heterosexual couple? The point is not concerned with which couple adopts.<BR/><BR/>The point is that these children are taken from the care of their family and put with strangers, using the force of law and outright threats against their grandparents. There is no evidence of abuse or mistreatment of the children at all.<BR/><BR/>The health issues are also irrelevant. If you regard them as that important then you will naturally extend this to the removal of all children from any sick parents, no matter what the circumstances.<BR/><BR/>You will then extend this to the removal of children from any parents who are at risk of becoming ill in future. Smokers are now unable to foster, so logically, smoking parents are unfit parents, yes? They might become sick.<BR/><BR/>Parents whose store cards show purchases of more than the approved limits of alcohol are also unfit parents in your view, yes? They might become sick.<BR/><BR/>As to age, women much older than 46 are offered IVF treatment. The age is a red herring, as you know.<BR/><BR/>This is simply more experimentation on human beings, Mengele-style, carried out by social services. They have used threats against an elderly couple in order to obtain subjects for their experiments. You are fine with this, yes?<BR/><BR/>Your wording is far more eloquent than the usual 'racist-bigot-homophobe' putdown although the message is the same: any opposition is a slight against the homosexual couple, even though it's clear they are not responsible for any of this. The blame lies entirely with the thugs of the SS.<BR/><BR/>It's good to see some literate Righteousness for a change. I look forward to future meetings.Leg-ironhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04932361799889315359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-36050178637285855122009-01-28T17:54:00.000+00:002009-01-28T17:54:00.000+00:00"It must be difficult not knowing which prejudice ...<I>"It must be difficult not knowing which prejudice should trump which."</I><BR/><BR/>Well, I'll go with pointing out the overweening power of the State to force a severence of familial links on spurious grounds - whch I'd have done even if the couple they wanted to adopt <I>weren't</I> gay, frankly. The fact that they are throws yt another social engineering spanner in the works, of course.<BR/><BR/><I>"Whilst 46 is not particularly old, 59 is quite old to take care of two small children."</I><BR/><BR/>And if this had been the result of a natural birth (not out of the realms of possibility, plus there's IVF, as Iain Dale points out), would the SS have swooped in? I think not... <BR/><BR/><I>"I'd be interested to know what you think makes a generic homosexual couple less suitable to raise these children than a generic heterosexual couple."</I><BR/><BR/>One word: nature. <BR/><BR/>Also, as the 'Mail' points out, <I>"Social workers themselves have admitted that the little girl is 'more wary' of men than women."</I><BR/><BR/>But hey, who cares about the welfare of the children? There's diversity brownie points to score here! <BR/><BR/>Right...?JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-65451058050534894472009-01-28T17:28:00.000+00:002009-01-28T17:28:00.000+00:00I feel for you in your current predicament. It mus...I feel for you in your current predicament. It must be difficult not knowing which prejudice should trump which.<BR/><BR/>Firstly, some facts. Whilst 46 is not particularly old, 59 is quite old to take care of two small children. Secondly, both grand-parents suffer from serious chronic diseases (diabetes, and heart disease, respectively). This may at least have some relevance to the council's actions.<BR/><BR/>Finally, presumably you are no less privy to the details of the people on the council's list of prospective foster parents than I am, so your comments on the prospective adoptive couple are presumably based on nothing specific to this case.<BR/><BR/>If so, I'd be interested to know what you think makes a generic homosexual couple less suitable to raise these children than a generic heterosexual couple.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com