tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post6322283520318084313..comments2024-03-29T05:21:11.278+00:00Comments on Ambush Predator: We Need America’s Sentencing Guidelines With Regards To Dangerous DogsJuliaMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-19895673701716748052014-10-12T06:38:09.955+01:002014-10-12T06:38:09.955+01:00"Far better to parallel UK firearms legislati...<i>"Far better to parallel UK firearms legislation by eliminating the hazard almost entirely..."</i><br /><br />The number of people getting shot is hardly 'nil', MTG...<br /><br /><i>"A dog is a possession and if someone orders their dog to attack someone, then they are using it as a weapon and should be treated accordingly..."</i><br /><br />Spot on!<br /><br /><i>"Now the question should be "who should have a dog capable of killing someone?""</i><br /><br />Pretty much all large breeds are 'capable'. though.<br />JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-41220517265394877842014-10-11T13:01:22.187+01:002014-10-11T13:01:22.187+01:00DD she was worried her two young children would be...DD she was worried her two young children would be killed if they escaped.” DD<br /><br />Then do not allow your bastards to escape. Simple.Furor Teutonicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13856575077967523322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-12030627813773372772014-10-10T13:33:38.469+01:002014-10-10T13:33:38.469+01:00One of the questions that were asked during the cl...One of the questions that were asked during the clampdown on firearms, post Hungerford, was "who should have access to an assault rifle?". Now the question should be "who should have a dog capable of killing someone?".Northishnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-31556759667533186672014-10-10T12:16:34.229+01:002014-10-10T12:16:34.229+01:00A dog is a possession and if someone orders their ...A dog is a possession and if someone orders their dog to attack someone, then they are using it as a weapon and should be treated accordingly (ABH, GBH, manslaughter, murder). If they are unable to control their dog and it attacks someone, then perhaps Clarkson's law should apply, partly for their negligence and partly because they are so stupid they don't deserve to breed.<br />PenseivatAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-1864192047264352732014-10-10T09:28:57.199+01:002014-10-10T09:28:57.199+01:00A completely different strategy is required to cou...A completely different strategy is required to counteract this mounting problem. Far better to parallel UK firearms legislation by eliminating the hazard almost entirely, or failing that, through responsible ownership combined with assurance of 'substantial' risk reduction. MTGnoreply@blogger.com