tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post7460576926001110923..comments2024-03-18T15:08:44.116+00:00Comments on Ambush Predator: Another Manifesto Pledge Honoured!JuliaMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-65982336638837506492008-07-08T18:58:00.000+01:002008-07-08T18:58:00.000+01:00Your adherence to a belief in our current system o...<I>Your adherence to a belief in our current system of Government is nieve, wrong-headed and foolish.</I><BR/><BR/>Another assumption.<BR/><BR/>Noting that a politician has honoured a manifesto promise is hardly partisan. The event is so rare these days, it has become noteworthy.Longriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15139120804208136012noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-57269088380265438392008-07-08T11:10:00.000+01:002008-07-08T11:10:00.000+01:00"Slinging insults at me doesn't make your case.TT"...<I>"Slinging insults at me doesn't make your case.<BR/><BR/>TT"</I><BR/><BR/>It's not meant to 'make my case' (whatever you imagine my case to be). <BR/><BR/>It's meant to convey my utter contempt for someone who trolls other's blogs whining about what they are writing about, yet never engages seriously or sets up their <I>own</I> blog to hold forth on what they view as the 'answers'.<BR/><BR/>You're an object of ridicule here while you maintain that attitude, only worth the fun of mauling if I'm in the mood...<BR/><BR/>Clear?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-85539378159176133002008-07-08T10:38:00.000+01:002008-07-08T10:38:00.000+01:00Please Julia, it would really help if you didn't p...Please Julia, it would really help if you didn't persist in the notion I believe in the blue boys, the labour party, or indeed the greens, can take on international sociology. Ain't never gonna happen.<BR/><BR/>Your adherence to a belief in our current system of Government is nieve, wrong-headed and foolish.<BR/><BR/>Slinging insults at me doesn't make your case.<BR/><BR/>TTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-36751801564005905712008-07-08T10:25:00.000+01:002008-07-08T10:25:00.000+01:00"You're the genuine article. A full blown middle-c...<I>"You're the genuine article. A full blown middle-class tosser with a crusade to re-enact 1979."</I> <BR/><BR/>Oh, hello again, Total Twat. I thought you'd left and gone to set up your own blog, so we could all revel in your wit and wisdom.. <BR/><BR/>Sadly, not.<BR/><BR/><I>"The way things are right now, matters are likely to be in your favour at the polls soon."</I><BR/><BR/>Grates, doesn't it? And all because of the failure of Nu Labour. Mmmmm, that tastes <I>goooood</I>.. ;)<BR/><BR/><I>"But trust me, Boris, and little David are just the same (maybe even a bit worse) than the current crop of greasy-pole merchants."</I><BR/><BR/>I have my doubts about dippy Dave, it's true. Though I fail to see how he could do worse than the current bunch!<BR/><BR/><I>"I thought that Ken's own figures showed that the increase for "high polluting" vehicles would make almost no difference..."</I><BR/><BR/>Yes indeed, but it was <B>never</B> about pollution, it was about appeasing his base and 'hitting the rich' to garner votes from greens and idiots like Total Twat up above.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-40610490271910569112008-07-08T09:03:00.001+01:002008-07-08T09:03:00.001+01:00I meant no difference to overall CO2 levels.I meant no difference to overall CO2 levels.Old BEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06974090439936326476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-33420802517211587562008-07-08T09:03:00.000+01:002008-07-08T09:03:00.000+01:00I thought that Ken's own figures showed that the i...I thought that Ken's own figures showed that the increase for "high polluting" vehicles would make almost no difference, and I dread to think about the cost of implementing and administering a system of two different prices given that the system already consumes most of its revenue.<BR/><BR/>I agree with congestion charging as a principle (much more free-market that queueing) but Ken's implementation leaves a lot to be desired.Old BEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06974090439936326476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-627081175329856970.post-86435280975242930532008-07-08T08:45:00.000+01:002008-07-08T08:45:00.000+01:00I'm really am quite shocked by your last two posts...I'm really am quite shocked by your last two posts. To be so partisan towards one political persuasion suggests a deeper affiliation than I had suspected. <BR/><BR/>My inital thought was you were a little Englander. But no, you're not. You're the genuine article. A full blown middle-class tosser with a crusade to re-enact 1979.<BR/><BR/>The way things are right now, matters are likely to be in your favour at the polls soon.<BR/><BR/>But trust me, Boris, and little David are just the same (maybe even a bit worse) than the current crop of greasy-pole merchants.<BR/><BR/>To believe these products of the English political landscape will somehow make a jot of difference to life in old Albion by a ballot-box competition is simply foolish. <BR/><BR/>Three or four political parties all queuing up in contest telling us they will make life better by ameliorating the harsher aspects of multi-national capitalism whilst continuing to support mass-murder is simply silly. And wrong.<BR/><BR/>I think you must be tapped. <BR/><BR/>TTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com