Saturday, 1 August 2026

I Hadn't Noticed...

Journalists are self-censoring their reporting on rightwing protests, Donald Trump’s administration and trans issues because of growing concerns about their personal safety, with newsrooms accused of “normalising” the risks they face. Hundreds of journalists from across the UK have anonymously disclosed increasing nervousness over their security. Some have reported avoiding or altering coverage on certain topics due to intimidation, leading to self-censorship and “a narrowing of the public conversation”.
The press is full of articles criticising Donald Trump and praising diversity and enrichment, and the ‘holocaust ‘ that trannies are supposedly faced with every day. I can’t see how there’d be room for any more! 

But that’s because this article is based on nothing, as usual.
The findings are revealed in a government-backed investigation into the safety of journalists, ordered amid growing hostility to traditional media across the west.

Government investigation finds what it wanted to find, news at eleven! 

Investigators found a widespread belief that abuse linked to reporting has increased, especially online.

A belief isn't proof. 

“Anti-immigration protests were most widely referenced by journalists, both regarding the in-person risks of attending the marches and the backlash to any subsequent reporting,” the investigation found.
One respondent described seeing a female journalist subjected to misogynistic heckling at a “unite the kingdom” rally, with the footage later uploaded to social media.

Quislings are treated harshly by the native population, eh? Get used tto that, because there's more coming.

Let's See The Same Apply Here!

A Green Party councillor gave advice to her constituents on how to avoid Metropolitan Police “surveillance” by sharing the location of one of the force’s facial recognition vans.

Hmm, the police won’t be too happy about that, but can they do anything about it? Well, Reader, they do in other areas… 

The warning of other drivers may constitute an offence obstructing a Police Officer. Obstructing a police officer means preventing a police officer carrying out his duties, or making it more difficult to do so. It must be a wilful act, meaning it was a deliberate act with the rider knowing and intending that the act will hinder the officer. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) charging standards actually state, among a list of behaviour, that warning other motorists of a police speed trap ahead would fulfil the offence. It doesn’t mention flashing headlights or waving at people, it just states warning other motorists.

But probably won’t invoke this, they seem to treat Greens as another of their favoured species after all.