The judge told Single: "Anything that is posted on the internet has the effect of opening a Pandora's box.Has a judge ever said that about anybody before?
"What you put on the internet can never be taken from it and while there may be some members in this organisation who do not deserve to be protected by the law, they should be able to expect that officers within the organisation will not abuse the information provided to them.
"The law exists to save people from such revenge attacks."
Anybody who has done more than, say, join a political party that the Establishment doesn't agree with?
Sounds like this judge is from the ‘bring back hanging’ mob. I don't happen to be a member of the BNP or agree with most of the crap they stand for however what this guy did was wrong and illegal.
ReplyDeleteI would find it difficult to live in any country that had the death penalty. I also found it impossible to honestly sign up to our armed forces having gone to a military boarding school.
There are very few basic human rights in my opinion. And yes, before someone says it opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one.
The right to life.
Protection from harm by the society we choose to be a part of.
Education.
To travel freely without let or hindrance.
To think and believe our own thoughts and more than that communicate these ideas in any way that does not harm others.
To do with our own body and mind exactly as we please, again as long as it harms not one other person.
Many of the above ideas and human rights have been neatly ignored by a judge, in this country? Go figure.
Don't get me started on the definition of life btw
ReplyDeletebriefly:
bacteria - yes
virus - no
Miss, who could and would you kill and then smile?
ReplyDeleteU forgot our important one, Mike, the right to green poo.
ReplyDelete"I don't happen to be a member of the BNP or agree with most of the crap they stand for however what this guy did was wrong and illegal."
ReplyDeleteIndeed. And the people that the judge arbitrarily decided might be said not to deserve the protection of the law were the victims...
When there's no outcry over his words in this case, something's very, very wrong with this country.
I should have kept my green poo to myself, lol
ReplyDeleteI knew it would come back to haunt me.
ReplyDeleteThis judge is a disgrace: clearly partisan, unless he's talking about reviving outlawry for known lawbreakers in the BNP.
ReplyDeleteDoes anyone think that he is doing anything of the sort?
One law for proponents of ideas approved of by the elite ...and none at all for their chosen villains.
Nope, he is simply saying that if someone is mad and/or bad then it’s ok to remove their human rights.
ReplyDeleteNote. Mad people need treatment and should get it freely. Bad people need to be stopped, legally and humanely. That btw does not include chopping hands off or hanging or any other masochistic method we could come up with.
I want ADHD
ReplyDeletehttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8232633.stm
I want it NOW!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteADHD?
ReplyDeleteDoesn't that stand for 'Attention Deficit - hey, look! a squirrel!'
nuts, I've been found out, lol
ReplyDeleteI think I said it b4
ReplyDeleteI started so many fights at my school - I had that attention-deficit disorder. So I didn't finish a lot of them.
So Ms, r u talking to me again?
ReplyDeleteI thought you was married and in love wiv kidz'n'stuff?
Anywho, back to our mistress’s topic:
ReplyDeleteProtected by the law or their law? Follow this if you dare.......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hk89Fwx7fQ
Protected by the law or their law? Follow this if you dare.......
ReplyDeleteThinking seriously for one second, remember I'm trying v.hard to suffer a mental illness.
Does my list of human rights cost too much?
So, it's finally been said, eh?
ReplyDeleteJulia, you've highlighted the main point, but the next point is that a fine of £200 is absolutely incredibly lenient. A couple of weeks in jail would've been more appropriate.
ReplyDeleteBut there again, going by the government's standards on keeping supposedly confidential data confidential, I suppose they didn't want to set a precedent ...
Data, confidential, what?
ReplyDeleteI was done for dangerous driving. No crash. No arrest at a scene of an accident. Pleaded guilty.
Why, over the space of four years seven people reported me for speeding, undertaking, spinning my wheels at lights etc. When it came to court I accepted that IF this queue of people who witnessed my allegedly dangerous driving came to court I would be found guilty. So I plea bargained and added I can’t have been driving that dangerously if I didn’t cause an accident. The judge said 'It was more by luck than judgment sonny that someone was not hurt'. I agreed with him and took my punishment on the chin.
Last week a police officer walked up to my landlady and told her I was a rapist and disqualified from driving. I am neither a rapist or disqualified from driving.
So you tell me, data, private, my arse.
ADHD used to be called being very naughty when I was at school. The remedy was often short, sharp and painful. Funny how it often cured ADHD.
ReplyDelete