Saturday, 16 January 2010

'Mail' FAIL!

Headline in the 'Mail':


Oooh, 'dinosaur sized'..! Scary!

Like this little chap? Or this one?

Cretins...

16 comments:

  1. Should stick to the BBC standard of double decker buses, much easier to get a size ratio from that constant ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was awaiting Mail comment that 'dinosaur sized' sharks should be exterminated to remove a serious hazard in coastal waters.

    Supported by sound reasoning that man has dominated the planet for nearly 0.25million years whereas sharks have only been around for, oh wait a mo....

    ReplyDelete
  3. and does size anti-matter?

    ReplyDelete
  4. sorry does anti'matter have a size?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I saw a shar once and it was as big as a fish

    ReplyDelete
  6. shark vs dolphin, which wins?

    ReplyDelete
  7. if a dinasour was muslim would it have to wear a hibjab?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like the Mail. Just my kind of paper. And it recently gave me a moment of national fame.

    "Oh dear.

    - Dave H., Cambs, UK., 3/1/2010 10:13"

    X-Factor here I come.

    Oddly, though, I'm sure my comment originally just consisted of “Oh bugger”.

    Perhaps, even in the Mail, it's possible to go that little bit too far.

    ReplyDelete
  9. There was I coming back from the pub yesterday when I was set upon by a shark-sized dinosaur.

    ReplyDelete
  10. the disonsuar said 'is it 'cus i is old, init?'

    and the shark said 'do my teeth look good in this frock?'

    ReplyDelete
  11. my keyboard is broke init, shamoo

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Mike"... I'd be tempted to take a bit more water with it. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. water costs more than petrol don't you know?

    ReplyDelete
  14. What they must have meant was Megaladon which was a larger than 'shark sized' shark which lived a couple of million years ago, - but 63 million years after the dinosaurs.

    ReplyDelete