Thursday, 4 February 2010

"...He read some books and he oiled his brain, he started to work and he started to train, and he knew he'd never be the same again..."

A generation of state-educated athletes should have been created for the London Olympics.

But a third of British medal hopefuls competing in 2012 will have gone to private schools, it emerged yesterday.
And who cares?

Really, who cares?

They aren’t being judged on how they conjugate Latin verbs, or what colour their old school tie is, or even how they play the Eton Wall Game (not currently featuring in the Olympics as far as I know, but give it time…).
Bosses at government agency UK Sport believe the proportion of independently educated athletes will be no lower than it was in the 2008 Beijing Olympics.

In that competition, 37 per cent of British medal winners came from private schools.
And how is this a problem?

Is this yet another of Labour’s barmy ‘social inequality’ drives? If they want more state-school educated athletes, perhaps not selling off all the playing fields would have been a start. Or perhaps investing in sport in the state system.

Oh, wait. They did:
The Government earmarked £2.4billion for state school sport between 2003 and next year with a view to creating athletes for 2012.

But four million youngsters are failing to play regularly in competitive fixtures at school - 72 per cent, according to Government figures.
Another resounding government success!

And why is this? Well, the definition of ‘sport’ seems to be rather elastic, to say the least, which is only to be expected if you leave the definition of such up to the schools:
Meanwhile, 58 per cent of secondary schools - and 32 per cent of all schools - offer cheerleading as a sport, the survey showed. More than one in five offer trampolining, 21 per cent yoga and 18 per cent 'circus skills', it added.
I’m looking hard, but I can’t see those on the Olympics list along with all the running, jumping and throwing things…

How does the government address these criticisms? The same way it does all criticisms – deny them point-blank:
A Department for Children spokesman insisted, however, that 'most Olympians will come from state schools'.

'Our focus is getting young people to take up five hours of high quality PE and sport a week and we are making great strides towards this.'
Well, let’s hope by the time 2012 rolls round, they’ve added the 1000metre Great Strides event…
A spokesman for UK Sport, which distributes lottery funding to Olympic hopefuls, said: 'The educational background of athletes has no bearing on how UK Sport invests its funds.'
Quite.

And nor should it…

12 comments:

  1. If they want to get more young athletes from state schools in maybe the BOC should lobby to have knife fighting added to the Games.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Circus skills"???

    Seriously, WTF??

    Wear a clown outfit, drive a funny car, shovel elephant shit?

    These are now sports?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Of course, nobody could have foreseen this when the "authorities" started to ban all competitive sports from government schools, and create an atmosphere of "nobody loses, all must have prizes". Nobody would have expected it, nobody at all.

    Well at least, nobody in the Public Sector, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Trampolineing is an Olympic sport...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I tend to agree with Weekend Yatchsman that this is caused more by the exclusion of competitive sports from schools than by a failure of government to spend enough. It's worth reminding ourselves that the best football players grow up in the slums of the world. Many other sports share that fact.

    British primary school children are cushioned from learning that life is competitive and that you need to push yourself to get the best. It's no wonder that we have so few decent sportsmen.

    And far from asking government to solve the problem we ought to acknowledge that your story proves that government involvement ought to be lessened.

    Incidentally I don't get upset about cheerleading per se. The purpose of sport for the vast majority of people who will never be championship standard is about exercise, learning to work in teams and fun. I don't see cheerleading as contrary to anything in that list.

    Another plus is that is the sort of activity that really pisses off the Harridon Harpersons of this world.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Circus skills at school (in my experience) tend to be more about the athletic aspects like trapeze, high wire, gymnastic moves than about clowns and animals.

    I like the idea about elephant shit. "We don't do detention or sitting in the corner as punishment in our school! Not any more."

    ReplyDelete
  7. Perhaps we should have "Synchronised Knitting".

    Well we have "Ice Rink Polishing", that sport where they frantically scrub the surface, and someone behind them lobs a curling stone.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What weekend yachtsman said.As you reap you sow was never truer

    ReplyDelete
  9. "These are now sports?"

    So it would appear!

    "Trampolineing is an Olympic sport..."

    It is? Blimey!

    "British primary school children are cushioned from learning that life is competitive..."

    Indeed. That was part of the reason for my choice of title. No-one's guessed the song yet, though... ;)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Graham Gouldman (he of 10cc/Hotlegs fame) wrote the song. However he wrote lots of songs for other people (Herman's Hermits/Yardbirds etc)

    I'm afraid I have no idea who performed it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Born To Lose (the song).
    Sport is one area you can't game, ironically.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Graham Gouldman (he of 10cc/Hotlegs fame) wrote the song."

    Correct. From the soundtrack to 'Animalympics'.

    And according to the sleeve notes, he sings it himself.

    "Sport is one area you can't game, ironically."

    Well, they haven't found a way yet.

    And you can certainly handicap...

    ReplyDelete