Wednesday, 28 September 2011

I Think Residents ‘Understand’ Them Only Too Well….

Barking MP Margaret Hodge has questioned why two homes for young people were allowed to open in the same street.
Did anyone question her about accurately locating Barking on a map? Because I doubt she could do it…
Mrs Hodge spoke at a community meeting which she held last Friday to tackle problems with the unruly behaviour of youths in Strathfield Gardens, Barking.

As reported in last week’s Post, residents have complained about a number of young people who live at the two privately-run homes – Holibrook House, which caters for teenagers with behavioural problems aged 14 to 18, and No. 20, an assisted living centre for 16 to 18-year-olds.
Yes, you’ve already spotted the problem, I’m sure.

Two of them? In the same road? What could possibly go wro….

Oh. Right. This:
It is said youths have shouted abuse at passers-by, thrown stones at buses, climbed on to the roofs of the homes and on one occasion barricaded the street with furniture.
Shocking! But not entirely unexpected.
But the care home managers say behaviour has improved significantly at both homes and that residents need to understand the young people come from “challenging” backgrounds.
Do they? So what?

Does that excuse them behaving like animals? Does it mean the neighbours should just put up with it?

Just how did this situation come about, then?
According to one resident, planning permission was given to turn No. 1 Strathfield Gardens into a youth home around seven years ago, while No. 20 had received permission in the 1960s to become a care home for the elderly.

Because the latter was already a care home, the new owners, Lodge Care Group, did not have to apply for change of use before it opened in 2009.
Ahhh, a very cunning plan indeed. How useful.
A number of residents spoke about incidents where they were allegedly taunted, intimidated and subjected to noise nuisance late at night.

Some felt more restrictions should be put on the youngsters, but managers at the homes said they could not force anyone to stay inside as they were not running secure units.
Indeed, as recounted in bloodcurdling detail by Winston Smith, these poor challenged baa-lambs feral creatures are actually the ones running the homes…

9 comments:

  1. Asking a question she already knows the answer to. Don't they all...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Could be worse...

    Margaret Hodge might move into the street!

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Barking MP Margaret Hodge..."

    Always thought there was something not quite right there...

    ReplyDelete
  4. @ PJH ..

    "Barking MP Margaret Hodge..."

    "Always thought there was something not quite right there" ...

    Indeed .. she's technically "Upney" .. (one stop beyond Barking) .. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ JP ...

    "Margaret Hodge might move into the street! " ..

    And live amongst the "common" people ?

    Yeah, right John ...

    Shit ! .. that low-flying pig almost hit the house then .. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Everything has to be somewhere.

    Somewhere else?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ms Hodge has always struck me as being quite common... and frankly, just a little bit foreign. Which is a bit of a surprise given that she did so much to promote the BNP's policies.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Could be worse...

    Margaret Hodge might move into the street!"


    I know this street. It'll never happen!

    "Everything has to be somewhere.

    Somewhere else?"


    If the homes were well run, there'd probably be fewer problems. Until then, I can't blame any NIMYs.

    "Which is a bit of a surprise given that she did so much to promote the BNP's policies."

    Indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I live down this street, and I find it appalling how nothing has been done about this so far, god knows how many times me and my family have been threatned and intimidated by these mindless thugs who live in those poor excuses for care homes.

    ReplyDelete