High-profile terror attacks and the brutal murder of soldier Lee Rigby have left Muslims in Bristol feeling…
Oh, what? You thought we were talking about Scousers..? ;)
… more vulnerable than at any time in the last 50 years.
They're feeling 'vulnerable'?!?
According to long-time community leader and former politician Abdul Malik, the city’s fast-growing Muslim population feels under siege.
And the fact that it's 'fast-growing' isn't supposed to make anyone
else feel equally under siege, I suppose..?
If so many Muslims didn't do so many hateful, disgusting and unpopular things, nor try to tell us that a desert dwelling child-raping warlord was the highest embodiment of human values, then people may not be so wary of them.
ReplyDeleteIt was interesting to see that the publishers of the Bristol Post has allowed Islamosceptic comment on their boards. How long such Islamosceptic comment will be allowed to remain is questionable which is why I've saved the page with the comments.
To put the answer to Mr Abdul Malik in words that he may understand, maybe you should look at your own Islamic path to find out why your ideology is often hated.
Also killing British soldiers on British streets whilst the killer shouts out an Islamic war cry, is the sort of thing that makes people look into the ideology of Islam properly and realise what a complete crock of medieval superstitious violent bollocks Islam is.
The best and most moral thing a Muslim can do would be to give up Islam. Islam ruins individuals and ruins nations. That's not prejudice, that's a fact.
Although an athiest, I have no problems with anyone following a specific cult, whether it be Christianity, Islam, Hinduism or the Dr Who Appreciation Society as long as they do not scare horses or old ladies. In my time I have worked alongside people from different religions, cultures and traditions. Some I liked, some I didn't. However, if anyone claims to be 'under seige' purely because they follow a particular religion then all they have to do is publicly deny any support for those who carry out terrorist atrocities in the name of that religion and actively aid the authorities in rooting out those whose aim is to enslave, kill, or torture. If a Mufti or Imam proclaimed that Muslim terrorists do not speak for them and tells their followers to do the same, then I may start showing some sympathy. Until they do, I will continue to class them as hypocritical whingers and parasites.
ReplyDeletePenseivat
Malik obviously had the likes of religious extremist Muriel Clark in mind when he spoke of muslims feeling "vulnerable" and "under siege".
ReplyDeleteTheir vulnerable Birmingham cousins certainly felt threatened by a public display of very scary swimwear. So much so that their siege mentality took a turn for the physical rather than rhetorical.
"How long such Islamosceptic comment will be allowed to remain is questionable.."
ReplyDeleteI wonder how soon it'll be before newspaper comments have a warning about Islam the way some of them do about gypsies?
"However, if anyone claims to be 'under seige' purely because they follow a particular religion then all they have to do is publicly deny any support for those who carry out terrorist atrocities in the name of that religion and actively aid the authorities in rooting out those whose aim is to enslave, kill, or torture."
Quite so.
And if the black community were so keen to march and protest against black gangsters gunning down teenagers, we'd take their claims of 'institutional racism' more seriously too...
"Malik obviously had the likes of religious extremist Muriel Clark in mind..."
The Greens... *sigh*