Plans to introduce tough new powers to tackle begging in Southampton have been criticised by a homelessness charity.
The chief executive of the Society of St James (SSJ) says he opposes the plans as "threatening people with legal action is not an appropriate response to dealing with complex social issues".No, but it is an appropriate response to allow ordinary, hardworking people to shop unmolested by drunks/drugged beggars.
Labour council chiefs say the plans, which could see begging banned in five areas of the city and beggars handed fines or arrested, are designed to crack down on "bogus" beggars who are not homeless but making up to £200 a day on the city's streets.Nice ‘work’ if you can get it…
As is mooching off the state in one of the ‘service industries’ that feeds off these people:
Trevor Pickup, chief executive of the SSJ which works with homeless people in the city, has written a letter saying that he opposes the move.
He says: "We understand that the issues are complex and that many of the people who have been begging are not homeless.
"There are also people who are homeless and sleeping rough who are not begging.
"SSJ undertook a survey in the summer and spoken to 51 people who were begging.
"The most common reason given for begging was to get money for alcohol and drugs, with 75 per cent of them saying they were dependant on drugs and alcohol. "I think you’ve rather proved the Labour council chiefs point there, Trevor…
"Another issue that was raised was that of problems faced by people trying to access welfare benefits, due to the tougher demands faced by claimants."Working as intended!
He says issues should be addressed by offering "more effective" outreach services to help get homeless people into alcohol and drug treatment programmes and "educating the public not to give to beggars but to donate to charities and local agencies", saying both approaches are being considered by the council.You can offer whatever you see fit, but if there’s no element of compulsion, you’ll never stop people begging or giving to beggars.
The only option left is, therefore, to remove them.
"We believe people should be supported to help them overcome their issues.
"Begging is a symptom of complex problems in people’s lives and criminalising this cannot be seen as a humane response in the 21st century."Tough. It’s a crime. It has been for a long time, and for good reason.
"educating the public not to give to beggars but to donate to charities and local agencies",
ReplyDeleteIs it overly cynical of me to point out that by donating to agencies and not to the beggars themselves you help to keep charity chiefs in their well paid positions?.
but I`m sure that such self serving thinking never crossed Mr Pickup`s mind.
Trevor Pickup may have a comfy job being paid to mooch his little charity, but I am willing to bet he has never had to walk around St Mary's after 4pm in the afternoon.
ReplyDelete"Is it overly cynical of me to point out that by donating to agencies and not to the beggars themselves you help to keep charity chiefs in their well paid positions?."
ReplyDeleteNope! This is definitely the place to come to be over-cynical, especially about 'charities'.
"...but I am willing to bet he has never had to walk around St Mary's after 4pm in the afternoon."
Heaven forfend!