McNeill published ‘scandalous satanic child abuse accusations’ and encouraged people ‘to take direct action against the children of these women.’
She allegedly published details of the cult, saying: ‘They would drink the blood of babies and then dance around wearing the skulls on parts of their bodies.
‘They would put them to sleep by injecting them, slit their throats, cook the babies and eat them.’
McNeill even claimed babies were cooked in a secret room in a McDonald’s restaurant on Finchley Road:
‘The ritual is performed on an upstairs room in McDonald’s on Mondays and Fridays.
‘Sacrifice, blood drinking and babies’ flesh eating occurs on Saturdays. The children are frequently injected and put to sleep, apparently the school nurse is the one who does the injections.
McNeill claimed up to 18 teachers from the primary school were also involved in abusing children. She said members of the cult - from all walks of society - carried out satanic rituals in secret rooms at a Hampstead church.Strangely, police did not immediately launch investigations costing millions of pounds and dozens of man-hours investigating her claims.
They had, after all, already dismissed them:
Ms Moore told the court: ‘In September 2014 the Metropolitan Police received reports of wide spread child abuse. Satanic child rape and murder in churches in Hampstead in north London.
‘These allegations surround two small children, commonly referred to as P and Q.’
She said police initially took the complaints seriously and interviewed the children. The matter eventually reached the High Court and Mrs Justice Pauffley ruled that the accusations relating to the cult were ‘baseless.’
But recordings of the children’s police interviews surfaced online and McNeill began her campaign to uncover the alleged cult, said Ms Moore.And she was promptly arrested and charged. Yet strangely, the only difference between this bonkers old bat's claims and those of the man known as 'Nick' is that her targets aren't celebrities and politicians.
Makes you think, doesn't it?
Strictly speaking, it was conservative celebrities and politicians.
ReplyDeleteThe moment Greville Janner's name came up, the left suddenly went all CSI with their new found respect for evidence. Look how Tom Watson suddenly changed his secret identity from Captain Noncefinder to Due Process Man.
Have a look at Hoaxted Research for the whole story. The whole story is a witches brew of Satanic Ritual Abuse allegations, Freeman on the Land woo, right wing religious wingnuts, loopy yanks, in fact everything. I actually feel sorry for the poor old DC and the lawyers who have to sort this out.
ReplyDeleteRetired
Anon I agree with you there. Hoaxted has the full background to this deeply unpleasant case that has its roots in a horrible Satanic Ritual Abuse hoax.
ReplyDeleteI think one of the things that has been made very clear by the whole Jimmy Savile inspired witch hunt on 1970s celebs is that there is a LOT of very disturbed people out there who you couldn't believe a word from.
ReplyDeleteNot only all the 'care in the community' brigade (who at least are usually in some way registered with the mental health authorities) but also the ones who should be under the mental health, but are flying under the radar. Its interesting that this case involves an obviously nutty woman - my experience of people with mental health is that women are frequently given a free pass for behaviour that if exhibited by a man would end up with them being sectioned, and thus women can often be clean off their heads, but never get officially diagnosed as suffering from some serious disorder.
The sister of a friend of mine was finally diagnosed as bipolar in her 50s, despite her behaviour having indicated she had been so since her teens. Her erratic behaviour got pushed under the carpet and smoothed over by her husband, and so she was never formally diagnosed. A man exhibiting the same behaviours would probably have attracted the attention of the police at some point (people are afraid of men behaving erratically in public, and tend to call the cops) and she would have probably been attended to by a psychiatric doctor once in custody, and her issues formally noted. This is how most people end up being sectioned nowadays - their behaviour becomes more erratic and eventually they do something that causes the police to be called who then involve mental health professionals if they suspect mental issues.
A friend of mine has been sectioned multiple times, and its always the police that end up being the trigger for him being sectioned - the mental health often won't act on family or friends warnings that a person is off the rails, even if they have a history of it, they tend to wait until some sort of crisis that usually involves the police.
"Strictly speaking, it was conservative celebrities and politicians.
ReplyDeleteThe moment Greville Janner's name came up, the left suddenly went all CSI with their new found respect for evidence. "
But..but the police investigate without fear or favour! Don't they?
" I actually feel sorry for the poor old DC and the lawyers who have to sort this out."
Good lord, there's everything in there but the Knights Templar. And it's usually them behind everything!
"...this deeply unpleasant case that has its roots in a horrible Satanic Ritual Abuse hoax."
You'd think there'd been enough of these that people would be wary. But no. Still believers.
"... there is a LOT of very disturbed people out there who you couldn't believe a word from."
Before the Internet, and social media in particular, who could they rant and rave to? A very small circle of fellow loons or if they were lucky, a stint at Speaker's Corner.
Now, though? They have a world-wide audience of millions.
And that's OK. So long as the people in charge of the apparatus of justice don't start believing 'there must be something to it'.
"This is how most people end up being sectioned nowadays - their behaviour becomes more erratic and eventually they do something that causes the police to be called..."
By which time, someone's usually injured. Or dead.
"By which time, someone's usually injured. Or dead"
ReplyDeleteIts better than it used to be. The massive hole in mental health law for decades was the problem that people who had been sectioned could be forcibly medicated for their own good, but those who had been released from section because the medication they'd been given had stabilised them could then refuse to take the medication that had helped them back to some sort of even keel. Thus you got a yo-yo effect of people who were too mentally ill to live unmedicated, but when medicated were too sane to stay in a mental institution. They would have a crisis, get sectioned, be medicated, improve, be released back into society, stop taking their meds, then go loopy and get into trouble (potentially fatally as occurred on a fairly regular basis), be sectioned, get medicated etc etc ad infinitum.
It was only under the Cameron govt that they finally closed this infinite loop situation, and created a new form of mental health order, that allowed the mental health authorities to put people on treatment orders, that allowed them to live in the community, but on the condition they took the prescribed meds, with the penalty of being re-sectioned if they refused. My friend who is a schizophrenic spent the entire 1990s and 2000s bouncing in and out of mental institutions all across the south of England on the loop I described above - since he was put on one of these new control orders he's lived a fairly uneventful life on his own outside of any institutions, apart from the one time an idiot CPN decided he no longer needed his control order, took him off it, and he promptly stopped taking the meds, went loopy again and had to be sectioned and medicated again.
I have to say I've noticed less cases of the 'nutter stabs woman in the street' type cases reported since the new control orders came in. (Sadly replaced with 'Man definitely not Muslim stabs woman in the street' instead.....)