Wednesday, 28 July 2021

What's Causing This?

A woman has been charged after a horrific dog attack left a family pet fighting for life in a Scots park.
A statement today from the north-east police division confirmed the charges on the 25-year-old woman and said that Holly was 'continuing to recover' after the ordeal.
Constable Mike Tindal added: “I’d like to thank the public for their response to our original appeal for information, which has been invaluable as we carried out our enquiries.”

At least the police have acted this time. But a 25 year old woman with one of these mutts? Isn't that strange? 

Police have seized a dog that allegedly bit the thumb off a Scots pensioner during a vicious attack on a West Lothian street. The 40-year-old female owner of the XL American Bulldog-type animal has also been reported to the Procurator Fiscal in connection with the incident.
Police Scotland have now confirmed that the animal’s owner has been reported over the incident and the dog seized.

Apparently not! Nor is it purely a Scottish phenomenon... 

A woman has been injured and her dog killed after being mauled by three rottweilers. The woman - in her 60s - had been out walking her dog in Sherburn Hill, County Durham, when they were attacked at about 19:00 BST on Tuesday. Her cavapoo died in the attack. A second dog was also attacked and is receiving treatment.
Three dogs have since been seized by Durham Police and a woman has been interviewed by officers. Police officers called to the scene managed to contain the dogs they seized in a garden in the nearby village of Littletown.

Should have shot them then and there on the spot. 

But why are women keeping these brutes? Are they managing them for the men in their lives? Or...is it a protection thing? 

4 comments:

  1. "Should have shot them there and then on the spot" - sounds fair. Now what about the dogs?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Perhaps the Scots pensioner's thumb was threatening the woman with the aggressive dog in the first case, and the woman in the second was being threatening by her presence, so the two female dog owners simply needed their aggressive dogs (Not).

    In my view, the owners should have the same injuries inflicted on them, the aggressive dogs should be destroyed, and compensation should be paid to the victims - and that's before the owners get to be whipped.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's not 'trans' women is it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. "...sounds fair. Now what about the dogs?"

    🤣

    "In my view, the owners should have the same injuries inflicted on them, the aggressive dogs should be destroyed, and compensation should be paid to the victims - and that's before the owners get to be whipped."

    At the moment, they don't eeven face societal opprobium...

    "It's not 'trans' women is it?"

    Looking at some of these ugly brutes, even Laurel Hubbard would struggle to restrain them!

    ReplyDelete