Sunday, 1 March 2026

And This Is A National Chain!

 But they can't seem to employ anyone who knows the rules of English Grammar!



3 comments:

  1. A case for the Association of Abolition of Abherrant Apostrophes, I fear.
    Penseivat

    ReplyDelete
  2. I fear the intrusive apostrophe is permanently with us on a grand scale, aided and abetted by the fact that spellcheckers don’t appear to be fully cognisant with the rules; while you can imagine a junior in charge of a one-off marketing poster (or a journalist, as you have frequently pointed out) to make the occasional slip, there are numerous examples to be found even on product packaging (looking at you, Johnson&Johnson) and in printed official notices and government handouts.

    Thanks to Little Tin God syndrome, there is a tendency even among people who should know better to bow to the machine’s judgment in either ignoring an apostrophe error or - worse - inserting one inappropriately (as my iPad occasionally attempts to do when confronted with a grammatically complex sentence).

    ReplyDelete
  3. There's also the question of creeping Americanisms - " for free" FFS! It's either free or it isn't. I suppose we're supposed to think ourselves lucky that they didn't include "gotten" . . .

    ReplyDelete