We Can’t Teach Them To Read Or Write, But We Can Teach Them That ‘Girlz Rool! Boyz Drool!’….

Pupils as young as five will be taught about the evils of 'wife beating' and the need to form healthy relationships.

The lessons are part of a controversial drive, unveiled today, to reduce violence against women and young girls.

They will include teaching boys that they must not beat their partners or any other female.

But beating other boys is OK, then? And will the five-year-old girls receive the same advice, or are they to be allowed to grow up into little charmers like these?

Last night, critics warned that ministers are cramming the already over-stuffed National Curriculum with lessons that should be taught in the home or in the community.

And so it should come as no surprise that one in five pupils leaves primary school unable to read and write…

The Government claims that violence against women is costing Britain an astonishing £40billion.

It has emerged they are carrying out five separate reviews into the causes and how women can be better protected.

This is despite evidence showing that boys and young men are more than twice as likely to fall victim to violence, and that young women are becoming increasingly aggressive.

Well, like the ‘man made global warming’ scam, some things obviously don’t require anything so jejune as ‘evidence’…

In a document peppered with the language of Miss Harman's equalities-agenda, the Government says the first ever Violence Against Women and Girls strategy is in production by departments across Whitehall, and will be published this autumn.

It declares: 'Our vision is a society where women and girls feel safe and confident in their homes and communities so that they can develop fully, live freely, contribute to society, and prosper in their daily lives. We want to overcome women's and girls' fear of crime and the gender-based violence that they experience.'

Men, presumably, can just f*** off…

How is this, in any way, shape or form, an ‘equality agenda’? Don’t words have their usual meanings any more?

As well as the lessons, the already stretched Health Service has been ordered to conduct studies into how it can improve treatment of women at risk of violence, and police must carry out a review of domestic violence incidents.

Separately, Dr Linda Papadopoulous is carrying out a 'fact-finding review of the sexualisation of girls and links to violence'. All will report back later this year, and lead to the publication of an action plan.

Whoopee! An action plan! That’ll fix everything…

Jill Kirby, of the Centre for Policy Studies, said Miss Harman and the Government should not be creating the impression violent crime is men against women, when the statistics show this is not the case.

She added: 'It is young men who are most likely to be the victims of violent crime. It is a distortion to suggest otherwise. It appears that everything must be viewed through the prism of 1960s feminism.'

Ouch! That’s going to leave a mark…

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling said: 'This Government answers every problem with another review instead of actually taking real action to get to grips with violent crime and its causes.'

Of course they do.

They are bereft of ideas and solutions, and have sucked the coffers dry; all they can do now is await the axe that will fall at the next General Election, and try to cause the incoming party as much damage as possible to clean up….