A man has been banned from keeping dogs for 10 years after his dog launched a savage attack on another dog that was "worse then a horror film".
Horrified people at the scene desperately tried to pull the Staffordshire bull terrier off its victim – but its jaws were clamped so tightly around the other dog's neck, it took three sedative injections before its teeth could finally be forced open.Injections? Surely it would have only taken one good hard blow with a hammer?
Clint Chambers, mitigating, said Brown agreed to have the dog put down shortly after the incident.
He had owned the dog for only about two weeks before the attack but, in that time, there had been two earlier incidents involving other dogs, including one when Tyson had bitten another dog.And that didn’t worry him?
On the latest occasion, Brown allowed the dog off his lead and Tyson ran around the corner.
Brown assumed the dog was running back home and claimed he had not been warned by the previous owner about Tyson's behaviour.So? He’d seen two incidents in the two short weeks he’d owned it!
Oh, and what did he do while passers-by and a vet were trying to help? The usual, for these types. Nothing:
"Everything was happening too fast for him," said Mr Chambers. Brown "froze"...Yes. While the other people desperately tried to get the attacking dog away for long enough for a vet to be called. That’s one long, long freeze!
Unemployed Brown, who had no previous convictions, was given an eight-week 7pm to 7am curfew and was ordered to pay £132.47 compensation for vet's bills and £85 costs.In other words, we’ll be paying it. As always.
At least in Grimsby, they do take it seriously enough for court action. Meanwhile, in Reading, nothing at all happens:
A pensioner is warning people in the Oxford Road area to be on their guard against a dog which savaged his mongrel. The 75-year-old was walking his three-year-old dog when a Staffordshire bull terrier which was off its lead attacked his pet.
He was left with a £200 vet bill but has been told there is little the police or the RSPCA can do.Really? And why not? The owner seems to be the same useless type as the first:
Samuel said: “The woman let the staffie off the lead and it made a beeline for my dog and attacked him. It bit him severely and I spent a good 15 minutes trying to separate them. When it got hold of my dog the woman said, ‘that’s what staffies do’. She was just watching and did nothing to help.Maybe the suggestion kiddies might be at risk and the dog isn’t the ‘normal’ type might move them?
Samuel is concerned the attack happened close to Norcot Nursery. He said: “What I'm really worried about is that that dog didn’t look right to me – it looked as if it was something more than a staffie.”
Samuel reported the incident to the police but was told there was little they could do about a dog-on-dog attack. The RSPCA said it was unable to take any action if the police did not.Oh. Guess not.
But in Kidderminster, they take tree-savaging seriously, never mind animal-savaging!
Wyre Forest District Council understands owners are training their dogs to fight in St George’s Park by making them attack the bases of trees which is destroying the bark. It appears to be mainly Staffordshire Bull Terriers which are causing the damage and local residents are being urged to contact the police with any information.Eh? Surely they will fob you off? After all, if they aren’t concerned with dog-eat-dog, dog-eat-tree must be waaaaay down on the list?
Residents are being urged to contact West Mercia Police on 101, quoting the incident reference number 112/S/141112. Any information about owner’s size, clothes, hair colour, ethnicity and the colour of the dog would be appreciated.I guess not.
Now, I'm all for localism, but this is just ridiculous! Surely we need some consistency, to prevent this postcode lottery of police action versus inaction?
Hitting a Staffie on the head with a hammer will have no effect if it's in attack mode. On the other hand, a properly trained dog will not attack anyway, just defend itself and its family.
ReplyDeleteA bit of consistency? A bit of consistency!
ReplyDeleteJulia, you demand too much.
Anon, hitting a staffy on the head with a crowbar will have the desired effect if one is not squeamish. They are not made of titanium.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteXX Tyson XX
ReplyDeleteOFFS!!!!
Nothing more origional in naming a pet as you general chav, is there?
ReplyDeleteI had occasion to deal with a Staffie-type dog which was loose in a street and was randomly attacking people. Two .38 calibre rounds through its head sorted out the problem immediately.
ReplyDeleteYes, I was in the Police and on duty at the time, not in the UK, of course.
A senior officer's comment was "Good shooting!"
Tyson
ReplyDeleteScheiss drauf FT got there first.
The first thing that comes into my mind when I am buying a new dog is to find a negro rapist's name for him.
XX Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteTyson
Scheiss drauf FT got there first.
The first thing that comes into my mind when I am buying a new dog is to find a negro rapist's name for him. XX
Ear biter.
"Tyson" is easier to say, for your average chav.
because the law itself is a mess. A Pitbull terrier is a banned breed, but a Staffordshire bull terrier is not and there seems to be no easy way to tell the difference.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteethnicity and the colour of the dog
ReplyDeleteWait, what ? Dogs have frickin' ethnicities now ???
Maybe I read that wrong. Perhaps the commas confused me. Shurely shome mishtake...
because the law itself is a mess. A Pitbull terrier is a banned breed, but a Staffordshire bull terrier is not and there seems to be no easy way to tell the difference.
ReplyDeleteBut Dr Roger Mugford can....at a price...normally paid for out of the chav scumbags legal aid.
Joolz, I take it you're more of a cat person?
ReplyDeleteFT, If the dog had been called "Mike", your first thought would be "Negro rapist"? It could have been named after the England cricketer or the world renowned Astrophysicist, but if naming it after a rapist was the object of the exercise, he could just have named it Jim'll..
As for "Illegal dog" legislation, what can I say, another ill thought out piece of useless shite on the statute books.
That's an illegal pitbull you have there. No it isn't, it's a Albanian flockhound, prove otherwise.
As for the "I let the dog off its lead and it ran around the corner, I just thought it had gone home". Not so much a problem with the dog, but the owner is an idiot.
Julia prefers dogs with special talents. A bicycle-riding pitbull answering to Adolf, would be the ideal Xmas gift.
ReplyDeleteRanter - "But Dr Roger Mugford can....at a price...
ReplyDeleteTape measures are 'spensive, donchaknow.
XX Budvar said...
ReplyDeleteif naming it after a rapist was the object of the exercise, he could just have named it Jim'll.. XX
I presume the mutt is older than the latest bollox over a wannabee "pop star". and his.... "preferences".
"Anon, hitting a staffy on the head with a crowbar will have the desired effect if one is not squeamish. They are not made of titanium."
ReplyDeleteOr simply throttle it. They breathe air, don't they?
"Nothing more origional in naming a pet as you general chav, is there?"
Add the kids in to that too!
"I had occasion to deal with a Staffie-type dog which was loose in a street and was randomly attacking people. Two .38 calibre rounds through its head sorted out the problem immediately.
Yes, I was in the Police and on duty at the time, not in the UK, of course."
Good shooting! I'm always amazed by hearing stories of pitbull shootings by police in the States, which usually state the dog survived...!
"Joolz, I take it you're more of a cat person?"
What gave the game away? ;)
Actually, I do like dogs - and large breeds for preference, not the ratty little yappers. Just not the sort of dogs owned by idiots who constantly get away with this sort of crap.