Thursday, 27 October 2016

It'd Be Less 'Sad' If The Owner Were Subject To A Destruction Order Too...

Sentencing, Justin Rouse QC described the pictures of the girl’s injuries as horrific. He added: “It’s obviously very sad for the child who was bitten by the dog, a choice of dog which seems to end up in the wrong hands all too frequently and probably for the wrong reasons.
“It’s sad for that dog – it’s been poorly trained and poorly cared for – that it had to be destroyed.”
Time for Clarkson's Law.
at

3 comments:

  1. Anonymous27 October 2016 at 19:45

    Clarkson's Law?

    Stonyground

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous28 October 2016 at 12:24

    Clarkson's Law just had its third reading on this blog and awaits unroyal assent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. JuliaM30 October 2016 at 06:54

    "Clarkson's Law?"

    Dogs that bite should immediately be destroyed. Followed by the owner.

    "Clarkson's Law just had its third reading on this blog and awaits unroyal assent."

    I'd implement it tomorrow!

    ReplyDelete