Yup, turned out that it really was
only a possibility:
Sentencing Anderson, Judge David Hatton QC said: “She was a serving officer in the safeguarding unit."
The judge said he did not know whether or not the ending of the relationship with Mr Hall could have been done in a more sensitive matter.
“She then pestered Mr Hall for several months to the extent he blocked her number and of his Facebook account.
“Mr Hall then formed an alternative relationship, which once she [Anderson] found out about she abused public office to conduct searches of Mr Hall, his new partner, the mother of his children and his father.”
Judge Hatton said it was to Anderson’s credit that he believed her “remorse was genuine and her regret deep”.
Which was why she only got a 14-month sentence
suspended for two years, I suppose?
Hell hath no fury.
ReplyDeleteA man who did the same would be jailed, indeed was:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-39303487
No threats of violence at all, still got 18 months in jail.
And I thought the authorities were meant to take stalking seriously...
ReplyDelete"Hell hath no fury."
ReplyDeleteYup, it's bunny boiler time, all right.
"A man who did the same would be jailed, indeed was..."
That's 'justice' for you... :/
"And I thought the authorities were meant to take stalking seriously..."
Clearly, depends on who is doing it.