Miss Griffiths said the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had embellished her account to police and lied in her statement.
Teesside Crown Court was told that she denied she had been in a sexual relationship with anyone else at the time the incident was said to have taken place. But she later admitted under cross-examination that she had exchanged WhatsApp messages with a friend that showed otherwise.And that, harridans, is why demands for phone access need to be made.
Because if not for this, it's possible this innocent man would have been railroaded by a vindictive woman. With the full connivance of the State's agents:
It also emerged that the complainant had admitted in a police interview that she embellished her account of the first time she slept with Mr Sewell.One has to ask why the CPS pressed ahead. And why they aren't the ones considering action:
Solicitors for the 40-year-old hospital consultant said they were considering taking out a private prosecution against the woman 'for perverting the course of justice'.But then, we all know why don't we, reader? It's the poisonous legacy of Starmer and Saunders. And until the CPS has been scoured clean of their acolytes, we will see more cases like this one.
Starmer & Saunders continued Blair & Brown's politicisation of the British Civil Service. Never before was the chasm between the Legal System and 'Justice' (quaint concept, I know) so wide.
ReplyDeleteAnd if feminists really cared about women, they'd be chewing The Guardian and BBC's arms off to write about this sort of thing; about how false allegations and, at the very least malicious embellishment, are so prevalent in sexual assault, rape and child arrangements cases now, they obscure the very real threat posed by REAL assailants, rapists and domestic abusers.
ReplyDelete"Never before was the chasm between the Legal System and 'Justice' (quaint concept, I know) so wide."
ReplyDeleteAnd, as with so many things, no appetite to reverse the decline with our so-called 'conservative' government... :/
"And if feminists really cared about women..."
The modern types don't. They really care about their careers. And won't touch the Third Rail of 'diversity'.