DS Hughes said that although it appeared 'quite clear' Mustafa's friend had committed an offence of causing or permitting another to use a motor vehicle without a licence or insurance, it was judged not in the public interest to prosecute.And if the next kid riding a scooter illegally bumps a passenger into the path of a bus instead of himself, will the CPS apologise to that person's family?
Asked by the coroner if he was concerned about children riding e-scooters, the officer said: 'Yes. I have dealt with a number of incidents involving e-scooters – both private and public trial scooters – including two fatalities and two serious injuries that I can recount off the top of my head.'
The officer said the issue of e-scooters being ridden on pavements was of particular concern.
Perhaps more police walking the beat would help, DS Hughes?
In a joint statement, headteachers Lynn Petrie and Pete White, said the Voi trial scheme had been 'instantly problematic' from its outset in September 2020 due to children using the machines illegally. The schools, part of the same academy group, said they had written to parents and held assemblies on the issue.
The headteachers added that Mustafa's death seemed to have done little to stop children riding e-scooters, which youths often seen riding past the schools.
So everyone's doing what they can, but Darwin's winning this race as he often does...
Relatives of Mustafa asked Mr Salmer why facial recognition couldn't be introduced to stop children logging on to accounts they are not registered to. But the regional general manager said it would be 'impractical…from a cost perspective' for all e-scooter providers to introduce such a facility at the moment, without significant subsidy.
So, to prevent your idiot kids killing themselves or others, the scooter company should be able to stick their hand in my pocket? No thanks.
Poor old Auriol Gray.
ReplyDeleteParents are supposed to be responsible for their children's actions, or they were in my day.
ReplyDeleteThis led to children being educated and warned, and even threatened in some cases, regarding their behaviour. Unfortunately, in these days of the death of western civilisation, children are brain washed into knowing their rights, but not their responsibilities.
In this case, the person who allowed this child to unlawfully ride a mechanically propelled vehicle which requires a driving licence and insurance, has a part to play in the events leading to this child's death. Will they, or the child's parents accept responsibility? I doubt it.
Penseivat
"Poor old Auriol Gray."
ReplyDeleteWell, indeed! They really have it in for her, don't they? Makes you wonder who the 'victim' was. And even more so, who she knew...
"Parents are supposed to be responsible for their children's actions, or they were in my day."
That's such an old-fashioned concept! Like 'shame'. Aren't we better for having abolished such?