A foreign sex offender who raped a teenage girl has avoided deportation after winning a ten-year asylum battle to remain in the UK, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. Judges ruled that deporting the rapist to Eritrea, East Africa, would breach his human rights because he had previously dodged military conscription and was at risk of being punished if he returned.What about the human rights of children in this country not to have to run the risk so some bewigged fool on the bench can stroke his conscience?
In an exclusive audit by this newspaper of the tribunal's recent decisions, we can also reveal how:
A Jamaican drug dealer who has been deported from the UK three times – only to then repeatedly sneak back into the country – has won his bid to stay.
An alleged crime boss accused by the Indian government of money laundering won his appeal against a Home Office decision to deny him asylum.
A Jamaican woman twice convicted of possession of drugs with intent to supply is still fighting deportation 22 years after she entered the UK.
An Italian drug dealer won an appeal against deportation – despite being described as having 'operational control' of a telephone line used to supply Class A drugs.
And the Tories have been in power for how long? Almost as long as some of these have been sucking up taxpayer funding on appeals.
Our audit of cases comes after Home Secretary James Cleverly called for a light to be shone on tribunal decisions, many of which are shrouded in secrecy because judges often impose draconian reporting restrictions.
Well, James, here's your light, and the cockroaches aren't scuttling under the nation's fridge, are they? Why would they, when they know you'll be doing nothing about them?
And how many of these are using taxpayers money to fund their defence through legal aid?
ReplyDeleteThe whole world is laughing at this country as, yet again, it is shown that our political masters and judiciary are nothing but numpties. It's as if they are all acting on orders by the same people.
Penseivat
"... judges often impose draconian reporting restrictions."
ReplyDeletePretty much an admission that they are up to no good.
If the Eritrean would be punished on his return to his homeland because he had "dodged" conscription, why shouldn't he suffer the consequences?
ReplyDeleteI fear vigilantism with this sort of thing.
ReplyDelete"And how many of these are using taxpayers money to fund their defence through legal aid?"
ReplyDeleteAll of them, or course!
"Pretty much an admission that they are up to no good."
Indeed!
"If the Eritrean would be punished on his return to his homeland because he had "dodged" conscription, why shouldn't he suffer the consequences?"
Better than we suffer the consequences of someone's soft heart...
"I fear vigilantism with this sort of thing."
Saw a clip on Twitter yesterday of just such action in Tower Hamlets when passers by rncountered a pickpocket. It wasn't pretty.