Is this what you call’consequences’? Sentences in on this case:
Nathan Otitodilchukwu, 18 (31.01.07), of Crow Lane, Romford and a 16-year-old boy from Dagenham appeared at the Old Bailey on Monday, 2 June. Nathan was sentenced to six years, the teenager received two years and eight monthsAnd the cop on the case has the audacity to shamelessly trot out the usual pre-drafted bullshit provided by the PR team to try to claim that what's being done here is 'justice' for the victim.
Let's not forget that Lucy Connolly was banged up for 31 months for a Tweet stating (in the wake of a mass murder committed by the child of parents granted asylum) that she 'could care less' if people set fire to asylum seeker hotels. Now immigrants (or the children of immigrants?) who actually set fire to - and killed - an elderly British man have got what will be lesser sentences than hers, once the usual leniency they will be automatically granted kicks in.
Someone make it make sense?
4 comments:
I'm sure I've mentioned this before-never trust anyone with too many vowels in their surname.
Jaded
Unfortunately for her, Lucy C was advised to plead guilty on the "common sense" basis, I reckon, that a guilty plea would have resulted - at worst - in a 60-day fully postponed detention + 120 days unpaid labour. Whatever; I don't think a jury would have convicted her had a trial taken place.
Indeed! It's like the warning colouration on venomous reptiles.
No, me neither.
Post a Comment