Thursday, 8 May 2025

What's Taking The Time?

Talking of 'not frightening the horses', it seems Ms Bogbrush Hair is letting her mouth write cheques her body can't cash again.
Chief Constable Swann (who leads on diversity for the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC), in case you wondered, Reader...) said: 'It is important for us to act on the Supreme Court's ruling as quickly as we can, as both our colleagues and the communities we serve are looking for clarity on some very challenging issues. But it will inevitably take time to consider the full implications of the ruling.'
Typical. But you may find you're out of your weight class in this one. JK Rowling's had enough of your shit:
In response the author, 59, took to X to tell her 14million followers: 'So the police are dragging their heels on stopping males strip-searching females, which, as the Supreme Court ruling confirmed, was illegal all along. I'm sure they hope no woman decides to sue.
'Of course, I'll fund her if she does.'

Will the Home Office slap down the rampant tranny community in the police farces before thay are further humiliated in the courts? Watch this space. 

8 comments:

Bucko said...

"looking for clarity on some very challenging issues"

Men - Men
Women - Women

If that's too challenging for you...

Lord T said...

We are talking about Plod. They are still struggling to understand the difference between hurting people and hurty words.

Anonymous said...

It is not only the police that struggle with the difference between hurting people and hurty feelz. The whole justice system seems to have lost any sense of proportion. Rapists are receiving community sentencing, while posting something on line that might, might, cause offence to someone somewhere can get you significant jail time.

Anonymous said...

Imagine sitting opposite this "woman" at a meeting or a briefing and trying to take her seriously
Jaded

JuliaM said...

Heh!

JuliaM said...

It's irreparably broken.

JuliaM said...

Thankfully, although we have at least one in my office, he doesn't work on my floor, but he's nothing like female and no-one who wasn't blind couldn't tell.

Anonymous said...

It is outrageous that highly trained and highly paid Chief Constables can’t apply the law without sitting around pontificating on it even though the Supreme Court has spelled it out for them. We expect constables on the streets to deal with incidents unfolding in front of them, to identify the legal issues and apply the law instantaneously.