Auchingarrich owner Alexa Reid said she could “not under any circumstances condone” his past actions, but said she wanted to give him a second chance. In a statement, she said: “Liam has expressed genuine remorse for his previous actions and a heartfelt desire to change.What did he do? Well, something that should have disqualified him from working for a wildlife park that's for sure!
But smug middle class white women are the absolute worst in our society:
“He understands the importance of responsible care for animals.
“We see this as a valuable opportunity for him to give back to the community and the animals, and we fully support his efforts.
“Our team will provide thorough training and supervision at all times as he learns about proper animal care and welfare.
“We recognise the negativity surrounding Liam due to his past actions, but we firmly believe that everyone deserves a second chance.
“Our goal is to assist him in making positive choices moving forward.”
No matter the understandable backlash, she's so convinced of the correctness of her actions she will not back down. Rather like the HR creatutes persecuting nurse Peggie for refusing to change in front of a man in womanface. What is it up there, something in the water?
Should I only drink bottled on my next visit?
1 comment:
Hang in, he was prosecuted for setting a dog on a rat? When did that become a crime? Dogs kill rats all the time, heck some are trained to do that very job. Its called killing vermin. And as for the charges of " neglecting five puppies, three dogs and a kitten and failing to protect them from disease and suffering' that sound very like he just didn't get them vaccinated.
I don't trust the likes of the SSPCA and RSPCA when they prosecute people for 'animal cruelty'. Quite often they lie through their teeth, and often prosecute people who just needed some help and assistance. In a case like this I wouldn't take the side of the SSPCA at all, until I had further knowledge form a truly independent source. And I'd say that a person who runs a local animal sanctuary would have a better idea of what sort of lad he is, than the SSPCA, so I'd side with the owner of the sanctuary to be frank.
Post a Comment