We Can Start By Being Honest About What They Are...

Yards from the Thames, in the churchyard of All Saints, which dates from the 12th Century, is the final resting place of the Victorian poet Matthew Arnold. In fact, the village of Laleham in Surrey is pretty much as quintessentially sleepy old England as you can still find.

Well, THAT won't do. Have some 'progress': 

So locals whose children attend the Church of England primary here were surprised in recent weeks to find a young Afghan man repeatedly loitering outside, approaching female pupils – and becoming aggressive when spoken to.

 As anyone would be!

According to one group of parents, he spat at them, and seemed to suggest that paying to be smuggled into Britain by dinghy gave him free rein. ‘I’m allowed to stand where I want – I paid £3,000 to be here,’ is what locals say he told them.

Some 'asylum seeker' - isn't that rather a large sum of money in his country of origin?  

Calls to the police followed, and after the asylum seeker ignored warnings, he was last week arrested and detained under the Mental Health Act.

Of course. The only surprise here was that they didn't arrest the complaining parents, too!

Only then did it emerge that the Afghan, in his 20s, had last month been placed in a 1920s semi along with five other migrants, at the behest of the Home Office. The house had been purchased by north London businessman Joshua Grunt, 48, in October for £500,000, who immediately let it out via an agent to house migrants.

However, the local authority, Spelthorne Borough Council, insists it had neither been informed nor consulted over the arrival of any migrants, saying: ‘The Council has written to the Home Office asking for an explanation and an assurance that this will not happen again.’

Waste of paper - they are far more arrogant and entitled than the fake refugee and will do it again sure as the sun rises in the east.

Yet a Daily Mail investigation has found that such sudden arrivals of migrants in villages and towns are about to happen on a huge scale – all over the country – as a direct result of Labour’s promises to close migrant hotels. And the only people celebrating will be those making fat profits as a result. At taxpayers’ expense.

Why are they always referred to by every branch of the MSM as 'migrants' when they are 'Illegal immigants'..?  

Let's Call It What It Is....

'Asian' gang, eh? Can I expect the defendants to be named Akimoto, Kihara, Myung, and Kim?

Mustafa Iqbal, 43, Ziaullah Badsha, 25, Mohamed Arshad, 36, and Jaswinder Singh, 65, face 28 charges between them, including accusations of trafficking for sexual exploitation, rape, supplying drugs and sexual assaults. They deny the charges.

Thought so. The MSM lies all the time, describing men as women, illegal immigrants as 'migrants', and Pakistani Muslims as ‘Asian’… 

And glossing over the fact that they have help in their offending from a race traitor:

A woman, Sarah Gray, 53, from Gronant, faces charges of conspiracy to supply cocaine and cannabis. Gray is accused of allowing her house to be used by Iqbal for sexual exploitation and perverting justice by washing bedding following a rape, which involved handcuffs, of the 16-year-old girl.

Is there any sign that this is yet another case where the police and courts have failed to get a grip and deal with the issue?  

Iqbal is also alleged to have breached a slavery trafficking risk order.

Gosh, it’s almost as if some cultures are just not law-abiding, isn’t it? 

Don't Let The MSM Gaslight You!

 Anyone who doesn't read social media, but just the newspapers, will be reading about the murderous ranmpage of an Afghan asylum seeker in the papers today, or watching on BBC news and will read what they want you to hear:

They make it sound as if he was just accidentally injured in a melee. Which I initially thought was the case. Reader, he was not (watch with caution):

WARNING: GRAPHIC

But spam it all over Owen Jones/James O'Brien/Zarah Sultana's etc. timelines

It's these people that call YOU racist for not wanting these SAVAGES on our streets https://t.co/zRrP56KZOk

— Leftwaffen-Watch ⬜️ (@LeftwaffenWatch) October 28, 2025

This is no doubt the 'sensitive footage' that the fucking useless Met Police don't want anyone seeing, so they can maintain the fiction that the streets are safe from these Third World imported savages: 

I make no apology for linking to the true events here, horrible as they are, because to allow the MSM to characterise this murderous savagery as they do is to live in the world Mark Twain waned us about: 

 

The Left Don't Do This To 'Explain' Anything...

... they do it to try to shut up people who are raising a subject they don't want other people to find out about.

Note: The article itself is paywalled. But there's better reporting of it on Twitter anyway.

He Used It For The Very Reason He Bought It

Most of the media reports of the court case that has resulted in a well-deserved guilty verdict for the owner of the XL bully that savaged a man to death in the street have led the reader to believe that this stemmed from another 'dog on dog' attack, with the dangerous mutt launching its attack on the owner's dog and his death becoming 'collateral damage' as a result when the beast turned on him. 

But actually, that's not so:

The American XL bully owner whose dog killed a neighbour “failed to control” it as he chased the victim suspecting he had put out a window at his home, it has emerged.

Following the smashing of a window at his home, Bell was said to have run from his address with his two dogs to chase Mr Langley, who he thought was responsible. After a short pursuit, one of Bell’s dogs, an XL Bully named ‘Titan’, grabbed Mr Langley by the throat, causing catastrophic injuries.

 He owned weapon dogs, and he used them as a weapon in the street. 

“It was clear from the evidence in this case that Bell had not attempted to control the dog as he chased Ian Langley, admitting in a police interview that his primary focus had been to catch Mr Langley.

“It was for this reason that he did not think to intervene in his dog’s pursuit.”

He bought it for that pursuit, he used it for that pursuit. He murdered that man as surely as if he'd shot him, it's just that the weapon he used wasn't a gun. 

Following his guilty plea, Bell was told by Judge Robert Adams that, “all sentencing options will be open to the court” when he returns to be sentenced in the New Year. He asked the Probation Service to prepare a background report on Bell prior to the sentencing hearing.

Not sure what 'background report is needed here, he deliberately set the dog on that man. Why is he not charged with that offence?