Well, Now He Knows Exactly How They Utterly Fail Those Challenges...

...coulld just have guessed that though, give he was dealing with the useless Met Police:

A Jewish lawyer was questioned by police after wearing a Star of David necklace which officers claimed 'antagonised' pro-Palestine supporters during a demonstration. 

He claims to have been acting as an independent spectator, watching the protest for illegal behaviour by participants and to observe how police responded to challenges on the ground.

Mission accomplished, chum!  

In a statement, police said the man was not arrested for wearing the necklace, but that he had allegedly 'continuously approached the area' allocated to the pro-Palestinian protestors on the evening, which in turn provoked a reaction.

And the fact that the Pally supporters response to the presence of a Jewish man near them was to 'react' bothered them not a jot, of course... 

 The man's defence labelled the officer's statements as 'ignorant' and said he had a 'great deal of concern' with the line of questioning.

As do we all... 

The detective said he did not want to offend by asking the question, adding that it was not a question about the man wearing the Star of David generally but in a 'very niche environment where tensions are high'. He then said that he did not want 'this to become a political debate in an interview'.

This is the calibre of man being appointed as a detective in the Mey Police? 

They rely on the old 'public order' bollocks, of course.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman told the Daily Mail: 'The man told officers he was acting as a legal observer, but his actions are alleged to have gone beyond observing to provoking and as such, actively participating as a protester.

'Over the course of an hour, the man is alleged to have continuously approached the area allocated to IJAN, getting very close to protesters to film them and in doing so provoking a reaction.

'Officers had to intervene on at least four occasions to ask the man to return to the Stop the Hate area as required by the conditions.

'When he failed to do so after multiple warnings, he was arrested. He was subsequently released on bail and the investigation continues.'

The investigation into what, exactly? Whether he's a habitual jewelley wearer?