Saturday 1 May 2010

Hidden Prejudices

John Harris in ‘CiF’ has an article on #bigotgate that reveals the way the progressives think.

First up, the subheading to his article:
Labour's political elite has failed to explain social change to ordinary people.
Ouch! Only someone steeped in GuardianWorld culture could not fail to notice the glaring insult in that sentence...
…the metropolitan media is part of the same problem. It tends to portray them as latter-day Alf Garnetts, nostalgic for a world long gone, and fired up by the kind of prejudices that have no place in London W1 or W11.

In fact, as Gillian Duffy proves, their concerns are a mixture of right and left-ish stuff, much of it traceable to the fact that as Britain has gone through convulsive change after convulsive change, nobody in power has ever bothered giving them much of an explanation.
Or asking them if it was what they wanted, and would have voted for...
… somewhere within Labour's collective psyche, there will a creeping awareness of how they arguably ended up here: by mortgaging their future on a mixture of contorted electoral arithmetic, and secondhand free-marketry, and so forgetting their own people that their own prime minister met an pretty average Labour voter, heard her concerns, and came away seething. (It's worth bearing in mind a phrase beloved of market traders in the West Midlands: "Never make a mug of your punter.")
Indeed!
…I'm rather reminded of a passage from a Tony Blair conference speech that both set out New Labour's credo, and captured its essential pathology. "The character of this changing world is indifferent to tradition," he said. "Unforgiving of frailty. No respecter of past reputations. It has no custom and practice. It is replete with opportunities, but they only go to those swift to adapt, slow to complain, open, willing and able to change." That doesn't describe Gillian Duffy, nor millions and millions of other people. And in this awful episode, here are the wages of that ever-festering disconnection.
No-one asked the likes of Gillian Duffy if she wanted the chance to adapt to this changing world, though...

5 comments:

Jiks said...

In my previous life in "Change Management" (yes, I know)I discovered pretty rapidly that that people don't like change very much. If it's foisted upon them they really, really don't like it.

If they are involved in the process of deciding what needs changing and they get what they actually wanted they then can become pretty happy and if I can use such a ghastly word, empowered.

So now we see large number of chickens coming home to roost as much due to enforced, unwanted changes to the nature of the country as much as Brown's astounding "open mouth, insert foot" abilities IMO.

Malthebof said...

This is what happens when the Metropolitan professional politicians run into Joe Public. They have disconnected from reality, Labour use to represent the working class but not any more hence rise of BNP.
I think a Rumanian solution may be the answer

Greencoat said...

'Labour's political elite has failed to explain social change to ordinary people.'

They can keep on 'explaining' until I throw the switch.

microdave said...

"No-one asked the likes of Gillian Duffy if she wanted the chance to adapt to this changing world" - or me, come to that...

Whilst trawling through various YouTube videos of 80's music earlier (thanks, Rab!) I considered what I would do if given the chance to turn the clock back 20 years. Even having to forgo the wonders of computers & the Internet I felt that it would only take me a few seconds to make the decision...

JuliaM said...

"In my previous life in "Change Management" (yes, I know)I discovered pretty rapidly that that people don't like change very much."

Which for a uniquely adaptable species is quite surprising...

"...Labour use to represent the working class but not any more hence rise of BNP."

Apart from the fixation on race, a LOT of the BNP's policies are pretty indestinguisghable from Old Labour's...

"...I considered what I would do if given the chance to turn the clock back 20 years. Even having to forgo the wonders of computers & the Internet I felt that it would only take me a few seconds to make the decision..."

Hence, I suspect, a lot of the popularity of BBC's 'Ashes to Ashes'.. ;)