Primary schools in England should be required to identify children at risk of leaving education at 16 without finding a job, a government review is to recommend.
How on earth are they supposed to do that?!
Alan Milburn, who is leading a review into Britain’s crisis in youth worklessness, said he would call for sweeping changes in education policy alongside a shake-up of the benefits system to address the problem. Speaking to the Guardian, he said ministers needed to “make somebody responsible” for identifying and supporting the children who risked becoming Neet (not in employment, education or training) after their GCSE year up to the age of 24.
I suppose you can't make the parents responsible for breeding the hopeless little shits in the first place, not if you want their votes, anyway,
“The warning signs are there from a very early, early age. You know, frankly from preschool,” he said.
Apart from obvious chavnames and ghetto monikers, I can’t see what else would be a predictor of future uselessness…
In an interview during a visit to Dublin this week, the former Labour health secretary said the recommendation would form part of his final report into Britain’s youth worklessness crisis, which is expected this autumn.Britain’s young adults are bearing the brunt of a rise in unemployment, with the number of 16 to 24-year-olds who are Neet surpassing a million earlier this year for the first time in more than a decade.
No shortage of unskilled jobs, but it seems they are all being filled by those imported to work for next to nothing by this and past governments!
No comments:
Post a Comment