A judge has launched a stinging attack on a drunken Wren who cried rape after claiming she woke up to find she was having sex with the wrong man.Uh oh….
Judge Jeff Blackett blamed the woman for drinking heavily, being an ‘enthusiastic participant’ in sex and said she did not come to court with ‘clean hands’.Oh, boy!
But in his withering judgment, he did not criticise those who brought the case because ‘we live in an atmosphere and era that makes it very difficult for the police and prosecuting authorities not to prosecute allegations of this nature’.And they should therefore be free from any criticism?
Good job we didn’t have this guy at Nuremburg, eh?
Judge Blackett said: ‘A woman who drinks to excess and returns voluntarily with two men, having sex with one man while the other is in the room, does not come to court with entirely clean hands.
‘This is the sort of case which in my opinion should never have come to court. There cannot be any higher consent to sex than enthusiastic participation in it. She responded for a few minutes to the defendant’s sexual advances. She felt him kissing her neck, kissed him on the lips and then allowed full sexual intercourse to take place.
‘If the defendant genuinely believed she consented, even though that belief may have been mistaken, he is not guilty of rape.It’s a bit harsh to criticise the service. What did they do, other than employ these people?
‘She said she blames herself and she must share that responsibility. None of this has brought any credit to the service and all three rates have let themselves and their service down.’
But wait a minute. Wasn’t this trial a few weeks ago? Why are we only hearing about this now?
His comments were made two weeks ago when Dinnell’s legal team applied to have the case dropped due to lack of evidence, but they can only be reported now for legal reasons.Very interesting…
4 comments:
Ta for link.
For me, the most damning thing about this whole episode is that the alleged "victim" cannot be named for "Legal Reasons" , despite the fact that she is an adult and old enough to ..
A: Legally buy & consume alcohol ..
B: Old enough to engage in legal sex ..
C: Old enough to serve in her country's Armed Forces ..
Whilst the Ratings found NOT GUILTY of the alleged offence have their names & photos spread all over the MSM ..
The Police are in an invidious position here .. damned if they do investigate .. damned if they don't ..
Undoubtedly, genuine rape does ruin lives .. but equally so do false allegations .. The playing field needs some urgent levelling ..
The sooner common sense prevails & all those who make such unfounded allegations are named, shamed & imprisoned .. the better ..
Legal nonsense on stilts. Oh the irony of women buying into the creed of "gender" equality, and then the casting aside of this principal in cases of so-called date-rape, before making a quick dash for the smelling salts like a Victorian maiden aunt.
"Ta for link."
Ta for story!
"For me, the most damning thing about this whole episode is that the alleged "victim" cannot be named for "Legal Reasons".."
As she hasn't technically (as far as the CPS are concerned) made a 'false rape claim', she won't even be prosecuted for it.
She should be.
" Oh the irony of women buying into the creed of "gender" equality, and then the casting aside of this principal in cases of so-called date-rape..."
Indeed! It's not, of course, equality that the radical feminists ever wanted.
Post a Comment