Monday 17 June 2013

Why Does It Take Three Years..?

Dudley Magistrates’ Court heard how Mohammed Mahdizada made no attempt to intervene when the Japanese akitas launched at Alan Pearce’s Staffordshire Bull Terrier, Oscar.
When Mr Pearce put his hand down to stop the two dogs, one bit his hand before biting him again on his two feet as he fell and slipped to the ground in the Fen Pool Nature Reserve in Pensnett, Dudley.
Mahdizada, 27, an asylum seeker from Iran who lives in Walpole Street, Wolverhampton, then walked away with the two dogs, making no contact with Mr Pearce, who later needed eight stitches to his feet.
*sighs*
Mahdizada was convicted following a trial last month of allowing a dog to be out of control in a public place. He claims to be looking after the dogs in his home while the owner is away in Iran.
Gosh, I hope the owner left him plenty of cans of Pedigree Chum too. After all, asylum seekers live in penury, according to the progressives…
The situation has left police unable to get owner’s permission to assess the dogs for their danger to the public from their owner – so an application to destroy them cannot be made.
Surely it can be made once Mr Anon returns? In the meantime, they are under the temporary ownership of Mr Mahdizada, so why cannot he give permission?

Would a vet refuse to treat them because he's not the owner?
Yesterday at the court hearing, deputy district judge Mr Prakash Aujla said: “If someone can’t be bothered to obey laws in this country or assist this court, they deserve the punishment it warrants.”
Oooh, I bet that didn't go down too well…
Mr Roy Paterson, defending, said Mahdizada had been living in the country as an asylum seeker for three years and did not work.
Why does it take three years to assess his claim?
Mahdizada will be sentenced at Wolverhampton Crown Court on July 10.
One to watch.

5 comments:

Dr Cromarty said...

Yesterday at the court hearing, deputy district judge Mr Prakash Aujla said: “If someone can’t be bothered to obey laws in this country or assist this court, they deserve the punishment it warrants.”


Imagine a white judge saying that...

Woman on a Raft said...

How to fix:

Summary conviction
Removal immediate
ID taken properly so that he can't return. Edict of non-return issued. It is not in the public interest for this man to be in Britain.

If he returns...we only pay the return fare once. See ending chapters of Great Expectations.

James Higham said...

Why does it take three years to assess his claim?

Word starting with b-u-r-e-a-

Anonymous said...

Going by the name, I would suggest that he and Allah are fairly well known to each other. I always thought that dogs were as unclean as pigs, unless they were really Japanese alligtors with shortened snouts? On the other hand, perhaps Islam is a selective sort of religion.
Penseivat

JuliaM said...

"On the other hand, perhaps Islam is a selective sort of religion."

Clearly, Iranians in particular aren't typical in this matter!