A couple who illegally claimed almost £50,000 in benefits have been given 80 years to pay it back - at just 85p per day.Looking at them, I don't think either are likely to see those ages...
Brian Payne, 43, will be 120 years old by the time the debt is repaid, while his 39-year-old partner Carol Cripwell will be 116.
And what prompted this amazing leniency? Well, would you be surprised to learn it was 'For the children!!'?
The fraudsters narrowly avoided a prison sentence after a judge at Bristol Crown Court told them it would have a 'catastrophic effect' on their six children.Presumably, having these two as parents isn't having a catastrophic effect on them then...?
6 comments:
Let us never be so harsh to the legal profession as to momentarily contemplate an indebtedness in the sum of £50,000 to one of them would result in another decision.
Given that their benefits will be index-linked but the 'debt' will not, they effectively have an interest free loan spread over 80+ years. Inflation will mean that they have in effect been given a gift of
at least half of that sum to spend now.
I don't think they are the sort to be mortified by having a criminal record, do you?
So theft from the state is not punishable? I must remember to point that out to HMRC when it comes to tax return time.
"She told the court their youngest child had medical needs"
I thought the NHS was free at the point of use, how can medical needs possibly be a defence???
"I don't think they are the sort to be mortified by having a criminal record, do you?"
Looking at them, clearly 'mortification' isn't in their dictionary...
"So theft from the state is not punishable? I must remember to point that out to HMRC when it comes to tax return time."
Let me know how you get on. I bake a mean 'cake with file inside'... ;)
"I thought the NHS was free at the point of use, how can medical needs possibly be a defence???"
Beats me - perhaps Nike trainers and Xboxes are 'medical equipment' now?
Syllogism:
IF you are in receipt of State aid (AKA taxpayers' money) and
IF you can afford to feed six children
THEN benefits are too high.
Post a Comment