I was expecting a PG rating, but noooo....
This rating was determined based on the presence of the following words:
* sex (3x)
* dead (2x)
* dangerous (1x)
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
Blog Rating
As noted by Leg-Iron and Longrider, you can get a blograting here.
I was expecting a PG rating, but noooo....
I was expecting a PG rating, but noooo....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
One server I occasionally use is particularly nanny-ish and blocks a vast range of material to protect users' innocent minds.
However, it then provides a screen telling me that 'access has been blocked because of the following' and helpfully goes on to list all the offending words or phrases in alphabetical order.
This blog seems to get past every time, but you should see what I get from Al-Jahom, Counting Cats and Constantly Furious!
What I find mildly amusing is that my blog, where the name has the word bollocks in it, is currently rated "General (All Ages Admitted)":
This rating was determined based on the presence of the following words:
* xxx (2x)
I'm sure I have a few naughty words in some of my posts which they've missed.
When this first came out I was rated PG.
Totally useless in other words. But then again, I repeat what everyone else has been saying about it.
Guess what I scored?
My mother must be so proud..
CF:Guess what I scored?
"Please report yourself to CEOP"?
Anything to do with the OPA(1429)?
Given that I just tried again after posting about it and got down(up?)graded to
"No bad words were found,"
I don't hold high hopes of this service being anything but loudly and publicly ridiculed. If it lasts that long that is.
I'm a PG!
For, wait for it, wait for it....bastards x1.
Very disappointing indeed.
CR.
No fair, my blog only got NC-17 and one post said 'c*nt'.
What's a man got to do to get 'R' rated?
They don't dig very deeply do they? Mine got a PG rating because of 2 x dead and 1 x bomb - they obviously don't stop long enough to have a look around.
Useless. It doesn't dig any further than the page it is given so has no idea what a site has sitting in the archives.
I tried one of those out back in January when I was moving the blog furniture around. I got NC-17 on the basis of 34 fuckings, 22 fucks, 8 guns, 7 bastards, 5 craps, 4 fags, a couple of cunts and a slap. The slap always puzzled me to be honest. Rating for violence?
I think it's bollocks, I got a 'Fine for everyone" at 18.00
just done it again and added one more post about whether I should watch Equilibrium or Highlander tonight and now get an 'R' rating because of
* testicle (4x)
* bastards (3x)
* fuck (2x)
* slap (1x)
None of which were included in the post
4 testicles? I'm not sure whether to be impressed or nauseated..
It's probably from all the times that commenters used the unabridged form of 'lady's front bottom' (I'm looking at you, Obo.)
Post a Comment