Monday, 24 January 2011

I Know RSS Feeds Are Inaccurate, But...

...this is a little odd:



Zero seconds ago?!?

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

oh that TimW, he's everywhere and blogs at the speed of light don't you know

;)

Angry Exile said...

Blogger is weird like that. I think the Google reader is more accurate but I tend to just start at the older end of the blogroll and work my way up.

Ian F4 said...

Mr Worstall is _very_ quick, Richie takedowns are almost instantaneous.

In fact, the one complaint I have about his rather excellent blog is he posts too many articles each day, mainly because my insane rantings in response always get hurriedly ignored once they drop further down the page.

Pavlov's Cat said...

The weird thing is, reading top to bottom it almost seems the bottom 2 are commenting on the top post.

JuliaM said...

"...that TimW, he's everywhere and blogs at the speed of light don't you know"

Quite!

"Blogger is weird like that. "

Yes, I've learned not to trust the RSS feed to tell me when there's a new post, as when I started up on Twitter, I noticed posts were being made yet it was lagging behind in announcing that.

"...once they drop further down the page."

I don't know how he keeps it up!

"The weird thing is, reading top to bottom it almost seems the bottom 2 are commenting on the top post."

Heh! It does, too :_

Lord T said...

That happens often. If you click a fraction of a second behind the post being published and it is less than a second in real time you get a big fat zero.