You won't see me coming....
Should stick to the BBC standard of double decker buses, much easier to get a size ratio from that constant ;-)
I was awaiting Mail comment that 'dinosaur sized' sharks should be exterminated to remove a serious hazard in coastal waters. Supported by sound reasoning that man has dominated the planet for nearly 0.25million years whereas sharks have only been around for, oh wait a mo....
does size matter?
and does size anti-matter?
sorry does anti'matter have a size?
I saw a shar once and it was as big as a fish
shark vs dolphin, which wins?
if a dinasour was muslim would it have to wear a hibjab?
I like the Mail. Just my kind of paper. And it recently gave me a moment of national fame."Oh dear.- Dave H., Cambs, UK., 3/1/2010 10:13"X-Factor here I come.Oddly, though, I'm sure my comment originally just consisted of “Oh bugger”. Perhaps, even in the Mail, it's possible to go that little bit too far.
There was I coming back from the pub yesterday when I was set upon by a shark-sized dinosaur.
the disonsuar said 'is it 'cus i is old, init?'and the shark said 'do my teeth look good in this frock?'
my keyboard is broke init, shamoo
"Mike"... I'd be tempted to take a bit more water with it. :-)
water costs more than petrol don't you know?
What they must have meant was Megaladon which was a larger than 'shark sized' shark which lived a couple of million years ago, - but 63 million years after the dinosaurs.
Post a comment