...finger on the pulse, that's our Matt!
You won't see me coming....
None of these should surprise me, given my own job, and yet, No1 does!
The proportion of secondary school students in England removed from class and placed in “internal exclusion” as a disciplinary measure has almost trebled in three years, according to new data.
And of course, it’s affecting the ones you could have guessed it’ll be affecting:
Poorer children are disproportionately affected, with more than one in five (22%) disadvantaged youngsters taken out of lessons at least once in 2025/26, up from 8% three years ago – a 175% increase, according to analysis of the data. The figure was one in ten (10%) for non-disadvantaged pupils. Children with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) are also overrepresented, with 18% of students with an education, health and care plan removed from class at least once in 2025/26.
In other words, the underclass and the ones unable to moderate their behaviour.
Critics say that putting pupils into internal exclusion – which varies between schools but is sometimes described as an “isolation room” – can damage mental wellbeing and result in lost learning.
Do those critics actively teach these children? No? Then why should we listen to a word they have to say? Nothing damages mental wellbeing like trying to learn when stuck in a class where someone disruptive is allowed to run riot, after all.
Unlike permanent exclusions and fixed term suspensions, when pupils are sent home, internal exclusions require children to remain on site and they are returned to their class at the end of the exclusion. While the government collects data on exclusions and suspensions, it does not for internal exclusions.
Well, someone obviously is! Who is it, and why are they doing it? Well Reader, I think you can guess, can’t you?
Arbor’s CEO and co-founder, James Weatherill, said: “Schools clearly need effective ways to respond when behaviour disrupts learning, and we know from schools that internal exclusion can be an important alternative to sending a pupil home. But the scale of this increase, particularly among disadvantaged pupils, should prompt us to look more closely at what is driving it.”
Yes, Reader, you guessed it - it’s yet another lobby organisation.
Pepe Di’Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “Internal exclusions are never used lightly but only after other avenues have been exhausted. They are a step short of an external exclusion and are designed to keep the student in school with appropriate learning support.”
You tell ‘em, Pepe!
A five-year-old boy died after jumping from a 15th-floor tower block window, believing he could fly, an inquest has ruled. Aalim Ahmed plunged to his death when he fell from a kitchen window at a residential block in Plaistow, east London. The window had become 'compromised' and could tilt and turn, allowing the autistic boy to open it and climb out.
...because they don't know what they are capable of. So why did we ever think they should be allowed (or more accurately, encouraged) to believe they could change their sex?
Mother Sahra Osman had reported safety concerns about the flat on multiple occasions. She blamed Newham Council for her son's death, saying it was 'preventable'.
It was, yes. by her taking more care to ensure her child couldn't access trthe windows. But of course, the council has deep pockets, so theres an opportiunity here.
The inquest heard contrasting accounts about the condition of the windows. An engineer sent by Newham Council to carry out an inspection and look at overhauling the windows and handles said they were functioning when he saw them on December 17, 2023.
Oh!
In contrast, Ms Osman had a list of complaints spanning several months, which included her fears the windows were opening too wide and she did not have a key, the court also heard. Assistant Coroner Ian Wade, sitting at East London Coroner's Court, said the windows 'were not used appropriately'.
Heh! Sounds like the council is prepared to fight this one for once, and not just roll over and hand this woman a pile of taxpayer's cash to go away, which is refreshing.
In a narrative conclusion on Monday, Mr Wade said Aalim's autism diagnosis made him 'incapable of making reliable judgments about his personal safety and abilities'
Seems it ran in the family...
The police farce that failed so badly over the Nottingham killer has been at it again:
Police failed to warn the families of three Nottingham attack victims that a mentally ill man obsessed with the case had been hunting for them – and allegedly played down the danger he posed.
The man, who had been sectioned and referred to the Government's Prevent programme over extremism, travelled to Somerset in an attempt to locate the families of victims Barnaby Webber and Grace O'Malley-Kumar. He had also visited the GP surgery of Dr Sanjoy Kumar, Grace's father, after claiming he knew of a 'cover-up' surrounding the June 2023 attacks.Yet Barnaby's parents Emma and David were not told about the man's journey for 18 months, while the family of Ian Coates, the 65-year-old school caretaker also murdered by triple killer Valdo Calocane, say they were never officially informed.
This mystery man isn't named or pictured anywhere, so it seems we can be confident he's not white English, since that's not the sort of madman our two-tier police and NHS fall all over themselves to protect these days....but just like Calocane, he's wracked up quite a career:
The man was later sectioned after threatening ambulance workers in London before absconding from hospital last October. Police eventually told the Webbers he was on the run, but failed to disclose his history of threatening behaviour or his fixation with the Nottingham killings.
Emma Webber said it was 'profoundly upsetting' that her family had been left without any safeguarding advice, particularly as her other son Charlie was attending school nearby. She added that the police briefing was 'fundamentally misleading' and said: 'We have been denied the right to protect ourselves.'
You'd be denied it anyway. God forbid you take measures in self defence that harmed a hair on the lunatic's head, you'd feel the full force of the law then!
According to The Times, Nottinghamshire Police has referred itself to the Independent Office for Police Conduct, which is already investigating failures surrounding the Nottingham attacks.The IOPC has apologised for not informing the families about its dealings with the man.
And no doubt that's the only apology you'll ever get.
Jonathan Bailey has announced he has withdrawn from West End show Sunday In The Park With George after his 'dearest friend' Ariana Grande pulled out last month. Ariana is performing her final ever show tonight (September 1) in London before she takes a step back from the public eye. Just hours before she takes to the stage, Jonathan shared a statement revealing his surprise exit in support of Ariana's decision to also withdraw.
He wrote on Instagram: 'Ari is one of my dearest friends, and my support for her is unwavering.
To the point that because she is leaving he has to? And this is not a case of an actor relieved to have a reason to be out of a failing production…
'Marianne [the production's director] is extraordinary and one of my longest collaborators and friends. After much consideration, I have decided to step back from Sunday in the Park with George.
'This brilliant, introspective musical has been a real passion project for me, and I feel incredibly lucky to have shared in its journey with this team.
It can’t have been, if it can’t be ditched for so ridiculous a reason!
'Among many things, the story explores the deep connection between George and Dot, a beautiful, devoted pairing, and I so look forward to seeing what the two actors who will now take on these roles will create with it.
'I wish the very best to the entire company, I will be cheering them on as they continue with this production. Jonny x'
Is it me, or does no one have any hard work ethic anymore?
The pair will both be recast as theatre bosses actively look for new talent.
Hopefully they will find some who are grateful for the chance and with the ability to stick it out to the finish.
Reform UK’s London mayoral contender Laila Cunningham has told how her children are “petrified” of going to Shepherd’s Bush after a fatal stabbing there.
The mother-of-seven launched fresh criticism of Sir Sadiq Khan’s record on crime after recent shootings and stabbings in the capital including the murder of a bus driver in Clapham.
“My heart goes out to the family of the person killed in Shepherd’s Bush...and to those injured. In a matter of seconds, families’ lives are changed forever,” she posted on X.“My own kids swim in Shepherd’s Bush. They’re now petrified of going there. And as their mum so am I. “We were there last weekend. It increasingly feels like nowhere is safe.
Nowhere is, but your children don't really fit the demographic in most danger from stabbing attack, do they?
“Week after week it’s another stabbing, another shooting, another family getting the phone call every parent dreads.”
“Sadiq Khan can keep telling us London is safe, but that means very little to families living with this fear,” she added.
Most of the families getting this call will only be surprised their spawn is a victim instead of a wanted perpetrator.
But Sir Sadiq has rejected claims of a “lawless London” with high numbers of shootings and stabbings.
That's the Labour way - flat out denial of what the public can see with their own eyes.
Earlier this week, he hit out at Donald Trump and Nigel Farage’s Reform UK who have sought to argue that the capital is plagued by crime.
He posted on X: “The loudest voices online aren't always the most accurate.
“New data shows our homicide rate is lower than every US state, while murder rates are at record lows.
Because our figures are massaged by Labour's liars, perchance? Still at least our cops aren't shooting donkeys, just running over cows. I'm not sure what's better, frankly.
“The evidence is clear: our approach to tackling crime and its causes works. It’s driving down violence right across the capital.”
But then along came Carnival...
A self-proclaimed misogynist with a history of violence against women has been banned from accessing 'incel forums' and loitering near female toilets.
And no, it's NOT a tranny, although it might as well be...
The 29-year-old self-described misogynist and member of an online incel group received the order at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court after he persistently breached the terms of several Civil Orders.
He is now prohibited from using any computers or mobile devices that can access the internet.
A good idea? Yes, undoubtedly! But wait...
But Valentine can still access the internet if he notifies the police VISOR team within three days of acquiring a device and registers it with the team.Valentine must have the device's location and data on at all times and again ensure no relevant information is deleted.
By the time he's misused it, it's too late, isn't it, for the victim? OK, you'll have the evidence, but so what? We have a prison space crisis, so he won't be put behind bars anyway.
In addition to the terms of the order, Valentine is not allowed to enter, use or loiter near any female toilets, changing rooms or women only spaces.
Detective Sergeant Paul Howell said: 'Valentine is well-known for his misogynistic hostility and violence towards women, and we are pleased to have secured this SHPO against him.
'Even though Valentine has not been convicted of any sexual offences, this is a preventative measure to keep women and girls in the county safe from harm.
Have you got the Social Media Flying Squad on it, then? However will they find the time for this as well?
'This order will reduce Valentine's ability to further explore his ideology and gives police the opportunity to monitor his behaviour in the community to help reduce his risk of further offending.
'Tackling violence against women and girls (VAWG) is a priority for Gloucestershire Constabulary and we will do all we can to prevent crimes, bring offenders to justice, and protect women and girls.'
Really? It's not as though you've got a spotless reputation in that field, although you've gone overboard at times, is it!
A police officer later exposed as a violent serial rapist passed vetting checks to join his force despite two existing reports of criminal behaviour against women.
What use are vetting checks that don’t work?
Alan Greer was investigated by police in 2002 and 2005 for making inappropriate phone calls to women and in one case was given a formal police caution.But he was given a job at Strathclyde Police – now Police Scotland – in 2009 despite vetting staff knowing about his history.
Police Scotland had claimed there were no 'missed opportunities' to expose Greer's offending sooner...
Really? Surely they wouldn’t lie about such a thing?
...but has now said its comments related only to the officer's police career, not his vetting.
Ah lying by omission. Or ‘clever PR’, as we no doubt refer to it these days…
Last month Lynn Ratcliff, assistant chief constable, said vetting was 'markedly different' compared to when Greer undertook the process and added he would not have passed current checks.
Is that another lie? Reader, it is, and an easily disproved one, at that!
A Strathclyde Police handbook from 2006, which details its standard operating procedures, said the force 'should not recruit people with cautions or convictions, which may call into question the integrity of the applicant or the force'.
Perhaps Lynn Ratcliffe should come under sctutiny for lying to the public?
A Police Scotland spokesman said: 'We have been completely open and transparent around information which can be shared in relation to the ongoing investigation into Alan Greer.
No you haven't - you've obfuscated and flat out lied at every turn so incompetently you've immediately been found out! I'm embarrassed for you.
A killer who took part in the murder of a teenager 30 years ago has died, the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) confirmed. Donna Marie Brand, 47, was serving a minimum of 17 years at HMP & YOI Stirling for her role in the murder of 14-year-old Caroline Glachan.The SPS said Brand had died in hospital on Wednesday while serving her sentence, which she began serving in 2024.…it’s the justice she should have had, arriving late and via natural causes, rather than through the too-lenient justice system.
On Thursday, an SPS spokesperson said: "Every death, whether in prison custody or in our communities is a tragedy for all those who knew and supported the individual."
Now, I hate some aspects of my job, burt at least it's not a job that expects me to state that it's a bad thing when a criminal kicks the bucket.