Anyone who doesn't read social media, but just the newspapers, will be reading about the murderous ranmpage of an Afghan asylum seeker in the papers today, or watching on BBC news and will read what they want you to hear:
WARNING: GRAPHIC
— Leftwaffen-Watch ⬜️ (@LeftwaffenWatch) October 28, 2025
But spam it all over Owen Jones/James O'Brien/Zarah Sultana's etc. timelines
It's these people that call YOU racist for not wanting these SAVAGES on our streets https://t.co/zRrP56KZOk
This is no doubt the 'sensitive footage' that the fucking useless Met Police don't want anyone seeing, so they can maintain the fiction that the streets are safe from these Third World imported savages:
I make no apology for linking to the true events here, horrible as they are, because to allow the MSM to characterise this murderous savagery as they do is to live in the world Mark Twain waned us about:
3 comments:
It seems that the police are more concerned with censring comment these days too:
https://www.snouts-in-the-trough.com/
Largely irrelevant, but is the attacker really 22?
He arrived in 2020, which would mean he was almost certainly admitted as a minor, with all the advantages and preferential treatment that confers. Once the authorities accepted a notional date of birth, that would establish it for legal purposes from then on and, as your previous posts have shown, the judicial dice seem to be weighted on the side of the migrant when it comes to assessing age.
(I may be cynical, but our area had a trial where all six defendants - five Africans and an Eastern European - were described as being between 18 and 21, having apparently begun orchestrating extensive grooming and exploitation of minors via social media six years earlier, when the eldest of them was only 15 - on paper, at least).
The loudest and most frequent sound of all - the stable door being closed after the horse has bolted.
Police persons patrolling after an event are just a Public Relations exercise to dodge blame, in my opinion.
Post a Comment