Afghans Jan Jahanzeb and Israr Niazal, both 17, had arrived only months earlier in small boats before assaulting the 15-year-old in a park on May 10.
Phone footage captured by the victim was so appalling that even one of the boy's own barristers warned it would lead to 'disorder' if 'the general public were exposed' to it.No wonder the bleeding hearts are getting worried.
In the distressing three-minute clip, the girl could be heard crying 'you're going to rape me' as she was dragged away from where she had been drinking with friends in Leamington Spa, Warwickshire. The footage, played at Warwick Crown Court yesterday, also showed her weeping, screaming 'help' and begging not to be taken to the park.She was forced to perform a sex act on the boys in a secluded area, before she escaped and filmed more clips describing her ordeal. The girl was eventually found by a passer-by who took her to a nearby police station, where officers were able to obtain vital forensic evidence.
The CPS didn't want to name them:
Jailing Jahanzeb for ten years and eight months, and Niazal for nine years and ten months, Judge Sylvia de Bertodano also accepted a legal challenge mounted by the Daily Mail which means they can be named for the first time.
But don't start praising the judge just yet. You've yet to hear her true concern about the impsct of this crime...
She said they had 'betrayed the interests' of genuine refugees and 'should feel a deep and lasting sense of shame'.
It takes a breathtaking lack of awareness to state this as a valid concern and a reason for shame, rather than considering the impact on the actual child victim, but we should welcome it as a true peek under the mask of the modern judiciary, and a reminder that their interests ans concerns are so often these days not those of the country, or thei fellow couyntrymen.
The asylum seekers were living in taxpayer-funded houses at the time of the attack, having arrived in the UK by small boats. The boys admitted the attack in October. Jahanze faces deportation, but Niazal does not, as he pleaded guilty a day before turning 17 – too young to qualify.
His barrister made the extraordinary suggestion this would allow the younger of the two rapists to 'make a life for himself in this country' when he is eventually released. The judge later confirmed during her sentencing that she would recommend that the Home Secretary considers deporting both Jahanzeb and Niazal.
If we really do see the back of this pair after they serve whatever of their sentence the Prison systems sees fit, no-one will be more surprised than me. After all, they weren't even remanded in custody after admitting thair crime.
2 comments:
Were they 17 or ‘17’?
A recent article on Afghanistan (following up on an older study of child soldiers) pointed out that birth dates are seldom recorded or even considered among much of the population; you are as old as you appear to be - or as you claim you are - with little respect for accurate dating even among those who have papers.
Our border force staff, required to believe new child migrants unless their appearance ‘very strongly suggests’ they are over 18, must be letting in large numbers who are happy to use the perceived credulity of the authorities to secure favourable treatment and bypass criteria they must see as irrelevant or even risible.
I wonder how all this looks to the activists and campaigners who vociferously oppose the use of compulsory x-rays and dental checks to ascertain age.
Thousands more arriving every day. We are getting fed up with shutting our mouths for the sake of diversity. Let's hope the next victim of these dinghy vermin is the wife or daughter of a Labour MP-then we will see change
Jaded.
Post a Comment