A mother whose baby boy Lucy Letby tried to murder hit back last night at the ‘upsetting’ and ‘disrespectful’ attempts to free her.
We've been here before, Reader....
The woman spoke out after a panel of experts claimed the former neo-natal nurse’s convictions were ‘one of the major injustices of modern times’. Letby’s new legal team yesterday unveiled a report which claimed all of the 14 babies murdered or harmed by her were victims of bad medical care and died or collapsed because of natural causes.Well, we can't have the state (in the form of the NHS) losing, can we? Wheel out the weeping mothers!
Retired Canadian medic Dr Shoo Lee, who presented the findings of 14 international experts at a two-hour press conference, claimed the panel understood the ‘stress and anguish’ of the families involved and insisted their aim was simply ‘to tell the truth’.
But the mother of a baby boy who Letby, 35, was convicted of attempting to murder described the press conference as a ‘publicity stunt’.
Just the sort of person that, as Longrider points out, shouldn't be asked for their opinion.
‘We want to hit back,’ the parent, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said.
‘Every aspect of what they are doing is so disrespectful, it is very upsetting.
‘They said the parents want to know the truth, but we’ve had the truth.
Well, you've had a verdict. You should know full well that it isn't always the same as the truth.
'We believe in the British justice system, we believe the jury made the right decision.
I expect the others in that link did too...until they didn't.
'We already have the truth and this panel of so-called experts don’t speak for us.’
'So-called' experts? I don't think there's any doubt about their qualifications, is there?
The mother claimed she had previously emailed Tory MP David Davis, who led the press conference, to complain about his involvement but he had ‘ignored her’.
Sound decision from Davis, I feel.
4 comments:
Your post title pretty much describes the whole of public life and law in the UK these days.
Even if Letby is as guilty as hell, she's entitled to the fair trial she obviously didn't get. If she's innocent - then it's a gross miscarriage (sorry) of justice. If Letby isn't guilty, then who is? The far more obvious candidates are still in the hospital ...
Lucy Letby is where she belongs and long may she stay there.
I have no idea whether Letby is guilty of innocent, but the thought of someone willing to leave a possibly innocent in prison, while allowing alleged offenders to go free, just so she can feel closure, doesn't seem right to me.
During my time as a Police officer I knew that sometimes guilty went free and innocents were punished, until appeals were made or or new evidence was produced.
The legal system is not perfect, and sometimes mistakes were made for one reason or another. I feel for the parents of the dead children, but the truth should be allowed to come out.
Penseivat
Post a Comment