A transgender woman has been accused of sexual assault after she 'concealed male genitalia' during a night with a Snapchat date. Paul Reid, prosecuting, told Teesside Crown Court that Watkin performed sex acts on the man after he arrived at a house in Thornaby, north Yorkshire, a number of years ago.
The MSM still ‘respecting pronouns’ of these transcultists, even as they stand in the dock. Why?
The prosecutor then told the jury that Watkin later contacted her date to reveal 'a massive secret.' Messages sent between the two were read out to the jury. When the alleged victim asked if the secret was that she was pregnant, Watkin replied: 'I'm trans. I'm sorry I didn't tell you.' The man messaged: 'WTF. So you have a d***?' before repeating his question. Watkin added: 'That's why I haven't s****** you.'
A clear case of sex by deception, brought in by progressive lawmakers who must surely have realised this was likely to snare unintended consequences in the net, unless they are even more stupid than I thought possible.
'The defendant had concealed from the man that she had a penis, during their brief relationship,' Mr Reid told the jury.
If it had a dick, it wasn’t a chick, MSM.
'The man told the police that if he had known Watkin was transgender, he would not have consented. He said: "I don't swing that way."'
Oh, if only there hade been some clue when you met IRL
And that’s not the most surprising thing about this story:
Watkin, of Thornaby, denies two counts of sexual assault and one count of sexual assault by penetration.
Do they mean ‘rape’ ? That would be the more normal charge, but since that’s an act that under UK law can only be carried out by a male, are they manipulating the charges to attempt to maintain a fiction?
No comments:
Post a Comment