Showing posts with label enough is enough. Show all posts
Showing posts with label enough is enough. Show all posts

Friday, 5 June 2026

Stoking The Flames....

 


Yes, Reader, that Neil Basu, who never saw a race bandwagon he wasn't happy to leap upon, here opining about others calling out the racist murder of Henry Nowak by a Sikh man obsessed with weapons, whose counter-claim of racism led Hampshire Police to treat the victim as suspect.

An event which brought home to even the most die-hard doubters that there is indeed two-tier policing in the UK, and which, if the weather had stayed hot, would have had unfortunate consequences for Southampton Police Station.

And let’s not forget that we wouldn’t even know as much as we do about this case if not for the pressure brought to bear on it by social media!

So spare me the ‘don’t look back in anger’ left wing commentators urging us to sing kumbayah and not descend into violence lest our cause is tarnished, when we know what they are really worried about is the edifice of multiculturalism falling down around their ears.

Thursday, 21 July 2022

Let's Stop This 'One Bite Allowed' Nonsense...

A woman's whose dog attacked a postman has been ordered to keep her pet muzzled and on a lead in public.

Why? Why isn't the thing destroyed immediately and her fined a huge amount? 

In her police interview the defendant said Roxy has separation anxiety and one of the triggers is shoes.

Wait, there's mitigation for bloody dogs now...?! Christ, defence solicitors will have to work overtime... 

The court heard Roxy has been assessed by a police dog expert.

Ah! A police expert, eh? 

She found the defendant is a responsible dog owner who has Roxy on a lead and ensures she wears a muzzle in public.
She has also bought a new letterbox to ensure postmen do not have to approach the front door. She is having a taller fence fitted and a more secure gate. And a stairgate has been fitted at the front door to prevent Roxy getting out.
Her view was that the defendant is a fit and proper person to have control of a dog and is a responsible dog owner.
She added: "From what I have seen of Roxy she is not a dangerous dog."

The poor bloody victim might have a different opinion, but who cares about him? 

And why is someone allowed to keep an animal that requires that level of security to prevent it harming anyone? 

Paul Kay, mitigating, said the defendant has no previous convictions. She lives on her own with her five-year-old grandson. The front door was open as they were going to the shop. She went in a separate room to put on her shoes.

What, the things that trigger the dog? Oh, FFS!