...the owner, who simply stood by, doing nothing to restrain his animals, had disappeared. He denied the attack on us but was eventually charged for an identical attack, two weeks later, on a neighbour’s dog, another spaniel the same size and colour as mine. She, too, had intervened and was also badly bitten.And that's where it gets a little....strange:
The police went to see her. Would she consider dropping the charges? The dogs’ owner was a recovering addict, said by his social worker to be doing well. The dogs, Staffordshire terrier-pit bull cross breeds, did not fall into the statutory category of dangerous dogs; they were also apparently his only friends.Ummm, what? Are we sure this was the police?
I mean, a lax response to the attack I can understand, I've seen that many times, but actively helping to quash the complaint? That's a new one!
It's not clear if she did agree to this, as the mention of a 'fine' might have been a FPN rather than anything imposed by a magistrate, but it makes you wonder, doesn't it?
He eventually received a derisory fine for aggravated assault and was merely advised to keep the dogs on the lead – hardly a serious deterrent for someone in possession of two clearly out of control and potentially lethal weapons.Yeah, well, there's a lot of that going around, it seems!
Blackburn-Smith kept Debo in a cage that was too small, which could have caused him to become violent, the court was told.I expect they've been given 'words of advice'...
But RSPCA officers and a police community support officer failed to notice this when they visited Blackburn-Smith's home regarding a separate noise complaint prior to the attack on Ms Williams.
And just what IS it with dog people?
Barbara Allen, from rescue charity Croydon Animal Samaritans, does not think the dog should have been put down.OK, Barbara, next time the police have a gravely-injured woman in a house with an 8st hellhound, can they give you a call, and you can go in with a Pedigree Jumbone and a soothing tone of voice?
She told the Advertiser: "I went mad when I saw this story on the news and they'd killed the dog.
"There was no need to shoot it – it was probably almost starved to death."
7 comments:
When the Judiciary aren't being total wankers in dealing with people who keep out of control dogs ..
They're being total wankers when it comes to their own out of control dogs ..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2081876/Foul-mouthed-judge-attacked-justice-guilty-owning-dangerous-dog-escapes-disciplinary-action.html
Yup, I've got that one coming up! ;)
You can go in with a Pedigree Jumbone and a soothing tone of voice
and go "om nom nom nom nom".
Over the new year a friend was attacked as she tried to rescue a lad being beaten, the old bill dont want her to press charges because she lives near them and think it serves no purpose. WTF happened to my country!
"WTF happened to my country!"
We'd all like to know that... :(
Am I the only one here who has that uncomfortable sneeking feeling that 'the recovering addict' owner just may have had a few friends or relatives in social services and/or the police (or some other powerfully placed connection) to warrant such an unprecedented act of advocacy on their behalf?
Whilst this sort of thing is all too common, when looking after their own, do you really believe this would occur for Joe Bloggs the unknown addict down the road?
I've got a dog, a staffie cross which has a good temperament but does not like small children. That's fine, we keep him on the lead near children.
So why is it that parents do not control their children but allow them to run up to a strange dog? That's just asking for trouble. Children should only approach dogs they know or ones which are under the owners control where they have been given permission to do so.
Dog owners as well. If someone has their dog on a lead then you put yours on a lead too and give them a wide berth.
Dogs can be fantastic animals as long as people treat them with respect.
Post a Comment