His campaign prompted a government U-turn that will see parents claim vouchers for about 1.3 million children in England during the summer holidays.
But he told BBC Breakfast there are "more steps that need to be taken".Of course. Did this scintillating intellect allow us a glimpse of his wisdom by explaining just what he had in mind?
A personal stylist for every chavmum, perhaps?
"People are struggling all year around so we still need to learn more about the situation people are in and how we can help them best."What happened to child benefit? That's still paid in the summer holidays, isn't it? How about they use it to feed the kiddies?
The support in England works out at about £15 a week per recipient, and will cost the public purse around £120m.Jesus wept! That's a lot of schooln'ospitals, isn't it? Has anyone got any other ideas to help him out?
Well... yes, actually:
There you go Marcus! Put your money where your mouth is. Not mine.
9 comments:
And he is in line for a knight hood now . What a F****** Laugh !
Not a knighthood - The Star of Wakanda.
Penseivat
I saw this at Tim Worstall's blog, I think that it is relevant here.
"Courtney Lawes, the Northampton and England lock, faced a backlash on Tuesday after suggesting it was important to be “financially secure and preferably married” before having children in order to reduce the levels of child poverty in the UK."
Of course there has been the usual backlash from the usual twit mob and the offensive remark has already been deleted. My parents were never very well off but myself and my two brothers never had to go begging to the state for food.
We hear that many of those in most need are single parent families. Where are the other parents? father's used to take pride in providing for their families. Either immaculate conception is hugely popular these days or the tax payer is bring clobbered unmercifully to allow many father's to walk away from their responsibilities. Those same tax payers who because they are forced to pay for the children of others often can afford very few of their own.
Why are we even considering feeding and continuously supporting these monkey-boys? dont waste my time telling me he cares about any none blacks with this, any chavs or other shit will be purely incidental, not my problem and not an excuse to rob my wallet yet again. Want to kick off and riot? let the Household Cavalry try a few charges with lances and sabres, they have a history off fucking up fuzzy wuzzies.
Not something I've thought about for many years but does the benefits system still make being a single mum a better financial option than being coupled up with a work shy twat ?
The proles have seen little of the £squillions spunked up on Covid thus far so £100m seems a small price to keep them happy for a while.
Usedtobebanned, sooner or later you will have to stop feeding this monster and suffer it's rage when you have the nerve to do that. Why not save years of forking out the taxpayers money and say no now?
Last I heard, childhood obesity was a bigger problem in this country than childhood starvation.
"Not a knighthood - The Star of Wakanda."
LOL!
"...and the offensive remark has already been deleted."
Never explain, never delete!
"We hear that many of those in most need are single parent families. Where are the other parents?"
Probably a better question to ask the broodmare than 'Who's the father?'...
"...but does the benefits system still make being a single mum a better financial option than being coupled up with a work shy twat ?"
Yes. It does,
"Last I heard, childhood obesity was a bigger problem in this country than childhood starvation."
Saw something the other day justifying including crisps and biscuits in food parcels as 'everyone deserves a treat'!
Post a Comment