This Is A Public Service Post

 ...just don't ask 'Why?' Or 'Who?'

Because those are awkward questuions for all involved. Again

The Golders Green terror suspect was previously jailed for stabbing a police officer and his dog, it emerged on Thursday. Essa Suleiman, 45, was arrested on Wednesday after two men were stabbed in broad daylight in the Jewish area. Now it can be revealed that the Somali-born British national was jailed indefinitely in 2008 for the knife attack on the officer.

Modern UK, where 'indefinitely' means something quite different to the establishment, and this particular stabby enricher was therefore out and roaming the streets - in London, not Mogadishu! - in barely a decade.

Following his release, the former security guard and interpreter was referred to Britain's anti-radicalisation scheme, Prevent, in 2020 as a potential risk to the public. But within months, his case was closed after it was decided he did not pose a risk of launching a terror attack.

The Prevent program must be the most misnamed in history, time after time it has failed to prevent anything. And now the most useless Prime Minister in human history, with one eye on the upcoming elections that will decide his fate, is trying to reassure the public, or at least one small part of it. 

But make no mistake, no-one has clean hands over this:

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'This man is clearly a danger to the UK's Jewish community. He should not have been walking the streets. We have been importing anti-Semitism and extremism from around the world and it has to end.

We were importing it all through your Party's time in office, under which this man was supposedly 'dealt with' the first time. 

'People like this should be deported where they are not British citizens, and if they have acquired British citizenship they should be stripped of it if they are dual nationals or are eligible to be citizens of another country.'

Yes, they should, so why didn't you, when you had the chance?  

RiP, 'ST'...

...you so shamed them, that even in death, the vile NHS denies you even the dignity of a name.

Extraordinarily, despite her death, the blanket restrictions which ban the media from identifying ST or anything about her and her family or mentioning the hospital involved, still stand.

Her family are devestated twice over: by the end of her brave fight, and by the intransigence and cowardice of the medical authorities and the state:

Her devastated parents said: 'We lost our beautiful and courageous daughter, known to the world as ST. To us she has a real name.'

They added: 'To her family she was everything and we will cherish and never forget the 19 years we had with her.

'The past year, however, has been one of struggle, even torture, for ST and for her family at the hands of the hospital and the Court of Protection.'

I hope some brave and selfless MP would stand up and name her in the Commons, but then, I remember too late, we don't have any, do we? 

'It seems if you disagree with the NHS you must, for that reason alone, be considered delusional.'

No-one can fail to be moved and horrified by the account of 'ST' (stripped even of her real name by the establishment fighting to see she dies in accordance with the NHS's predictions). But also, no-one can be in the least surprised, either. 

Anyone who says they are surprised at the actions of the medical professionals and the state-appointed court system hasn't really been paying any attention, have they?

Some £1.5 million would need to be raised by the family — the NHS would not have to foot the bill — to cover the costs of an air ambulance to either Canada or America, where three hospitals have offered to treat her, and the subsequent clinical trials.

But, says ST, 'because of the court proceedings I am blocked from going [to North America] and because of the gagging orders I cannot fundraise to finance my treatment and transport'.

This is an NHS and court system, remember, that will happily squander taxpayer cash on the undeserving and the criminal, but won't allow other people to spend their cash in a way that isn't in accordance with its wishes...

Whatever her fate, ST says the 'system urgently needs to change' so no one else will ever have to go through what she and her family have in the past year. She insists she will not give up.

'I am in a race against time to escape from this system and the certain death it wishes to impose on me,' she tells me, before vowing: 'But I am a fighter and will continue to fight. I trust in God and will not give up hope.'

I don't believe in God. I wish I did. I wish I did because it would be nice to be able to believe that a reckoning will one day come to everyone involved in denying this brave young lady her chance. 

Why The Difference..?

Family with seriously ill child are arrested when she dies:

The Met Police have defended their actions, stating the arrests were 'necessary due to the seriousness of this tragic incident'.

Family who buy pitbull type which kills their four-year old are treated as poor victims:

Giving an update earlier on Wednesday, Superintendent Marc Tarbit said that the child's family are being supported by specially trained officers.

'An investigation is currently under way to fully understand the circumstances but we currently believe that this was a tragic, isolated incident and there is no threat to the wider community,' he said.

'Accordingly, no arrests have been made at this time.'

The difference surely can't be down to different forces - don't they all follow the same guidelines? Is the mauling death of a four year old considered 'less serious'? Did the Met Police fear that Mr Weiss was 'a danger to the wider community'?