Wednesday, 19 February 2025

A Likely Story

The former deputy police and crime commissioner for Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland accepted responsibility for the posts - but did not agree they would make people think he was biased as a magistrate, the Telegraph reported. He said he did not refer to his judicial role in any of the posts, adding he takes his work very seriously and would never consciously let his opinions affect it.

Sure, sure, and the cheque is in the post.... 

But an investigation found that posting on a 'politically sensitive' matter meant Mr Master had not lived up to the expectations that came with his position. It also found the magistrate had never before been involved in misconduct investigations, 'accepted responsibility for his actions' and 'agreed to reflect' on them. Social media guidance for the judiciary says judicial office holders should be aware of the risk of undermining trust and confidence in the judiciary by expressing, or appearing to endorse, views which could cast doubt on their objectivity. It also says they should also not comment on matters of controversy.

So, should he no longer be a magistrate? Oh, of course not! A few words of censure will get him back on track, won't it? 

A JCIO spokesperson said of the investigation conducted by the Midlands Conduct Advisory Committee: 'Mr Justice Keehan and the Lord Chancellor agreed with the findings and issued Mr Master with formal advice. 'In making this decision, they took into consideration that Mr Master had no previous findings of misconduct against him, had accepted responsibility for his actions and agreed to reflect on the consequences of what he'd done.'

Said reflection no doubt consisting of 'Well, I got away with that!' 

This Is Why They Should Be Shot On Sight...

Despite the attack, the dogs have since been returned to Flood.

In other words, despite her loose vicious mutts attacking an 88 year old man's two dogs and killing one after getting out while the useless chav bitch of an owner was asleep - at 3:30pm. 

Following her guilty plea magistrates made a contingent destruction order, stating that if Flood fails to keep certain conditions such as having the dogs muzzled, on a lead and secured in her garden, they will be put down.

She's ALREADY failed those conditions, so why give her another chance? Yet they always do

Flood was told she must take her responsibilities for dog ownership more seriously going forward.

Like that's going to happen... 

Flood was ordered to pay the pensioner £700 for the cost of the pedigree chihuahua, £500 for his psychological damage and £300 towards the vet bill for his other chihuahua.

'Towards' the vet bill, so I doubt it even covers the full amount. God, I'm so very sick of reading these stories. What's the point of licensing wild animals if the domestic ones freely available to every Tom, Dick and Harry can do as much damage?  

Tuesday, 18 February 2025

More Judges Like This One, Please!

A barrister refused to take a roadside breath test after she was stopped on suspicion of drink-driving on the grounds she had just had cosmetic surgery on her lips.
Rachel Tansey, 44, was pulled over after reports that her silver Range Rover was 'weaving around' a bypass at 20mph. But when police asked the lawyer to provide a breath sample, she only partially put her lips around the tube then cited cosmetic treatment the day before, a court heard.
The mother-of-three – who lives in a £1.4 million mansion in Formby, Merseyside – told officers: 'Do not tell me what I can and cannot do.
'I am doing my very best. It is like asking someone to jump up after a tummy tuck. I cannot do it.'

If - after reading that high-handed attempt at evading consequences - you have an image in your head of just what she looks like, you won't be disappointed.  

After also refusing to submit to a blood test instead due to an undiagnosed phobia of needles, Tansey was charged with failing to provide breath and blood samples. At Sefton Magistrates' Court, she denied wrongdoing, insisting she had only been driving slowly as she had dropped a chicken wrap and been swilling mouthwash.

Ha ha ha ha! Well, no doubt she's seen other judges fall for such lame-ass excuses, so why not try her luck? 

However, she is now facing a possible jail sentence after a judge accused her of trying to 'manipulate the situation' to her advantage and lacking 'any kind of credibility whatsoever'.

Ah, that's why. Not all judges are morons. 

Convicting her of both charges of failing to provide samples of breath and blood, District Judge James Hatton told her: 'From the moment you got out of the car you attempted to manipulate this situation. 'You have tried to delay and delay and delay the officers. You tell the officers that you had nothing to drink. Clearly you had at least something to drink. You are a witness who lacks any kind of credibility whatsoever.'

Round of applause for his honour! 

He bailed her for sentencing, saying a community order was 'likely', but he would leave 'all options open, including custody'.

I wonder what options her firm are holding open? 

That’s A Good Result!

For a nice change....

The multi-millionaire owner of three dogs that carried out a “terrifying” attack in a Croydon park has been issued a large fine.

Not XL Bullies, a rather more exotic import, as one would expect from Croydon: 

The incident happened in Lloyd Park around 4.50pm on July 21, 2023, involving three large Turkish Kangals belonging to Anwar Ansari. A man and several chickens were set upon by the dogs, leaving them with several injuries. The Daily Mail reported that the dogs killed three chickens, injured another dog and attacked a jogger.

If I decided to keep a wolf, I'd have to obtain a licence and follow strict regulations on the care and keeping of such an animal. 

But if I opted to keep a dog specifically bred to fight off wolves, with all that implied for size, power and temperament, it's not even necessary to get a 37p licence any more. And I could take it out in public with nothing more thsan a lead, and even discard that whenever I liked.

Following a police investigation the dogs were seized under the Dangerous Dogs Act. Ansari, 67, of Hadley High Drive, was sentenced at Willesden Magistrates’ Court after pleading not guilty to six dangerous dog offences.The courts ordered Ansari to pay £13,000 in compensation to the victims and £52,410.00 for the MPS kennel and veterinary costs.
He was also been banned (sic) from keeping dogs for 10 years.

If only this was the policy everywhere else in the country. 

Monday, 17 February 2025

They Are Just Spitting In Our Bloody Faces Now, Aren't They?

An Albanian criminal is allowed the stay in Britain in part because his son has 'distaste' for foreign chicken nuggets, an immigration tribunal ruled. It would be 'unduly harsh' for the 10-year-old boy to be forced to move back with his father due to his sensory issues with different types of food. The judge allowed the father's appeal against deportation as a breach of his right to a family life as a result.
Hey, Hollywood, you like rebooting old TV shows and movies, right? How about rebooting that old 80s Michael Douglas flick, 'The Star Chamber'?

Only this time, instead of judges and prosecutors hunting down criminals who they think have got away with it, how about ordinary members of the public hunting down and executing activist judges and human rights lawyers?
The child's 'additional' needs were supported only by evidence from a trainee educational psychologist, a neighbour and a family friend. There was no formal diagnosis of special educational needs, The Telegraph reported. But he did have an educational plan to deal with his 'emotional regulation, independence; reading and writing.'

Drawn up by some council wonk, with no qualifications at all, no doubt. 

The case will be reheard by a different judge to decide whether the consequences of deportation would be unduly harsh on the 10-year-old boy. The case is ongoing.

Who'd bet on them reaching the right conclusion? Not me.  

And Yet Another One....

A man and a woman suffered serious injuries trying to protect three children from their dog.

No breed mentioned, I notice. Hmm, the Wirral, I wonder...


 Bingo!

Officers said the man tried to get the dog out of the house when he was attacked. The children were unharmed. The breed of the dog has not yet been determined and police said its owner had agreed for it to be put down.
Ch Insp Dave Atkinson praised the officers who stopped the attack (Ed: according to Facebook, two unarmed female officers), saying they had "bravely faced the situation". When they arrived at the house the dog was still attacking the woman who was bitten in the face and suffered deep cuts to her forearms. The man suffered serious cuts to his legs and arms.

Bites. They were mauled, not 'cut'. And why are unarmed female officers sent to a report of a dangerous dog, and not an ARV?

H/T: ProtectOurPets via Twitter


Saturday, 15 February 2025

Knife Crime And Why It's Unsolveable

The 'Guardian' does one of its 'deep dives' into a social issue, in a bid to ensure the real cause isn’t mentioned. This time, it’s knife crime. 
But away from opportunistic politicking and tabloid frenzy is a side of the story we tend to see less: the voices of the hundreds of people who silently bleed from every stab wound inflicted.
Jessica Plummer, whose son was stabbed to death in 2015; Martin Griffiths, a trauma surgeon at the Royal London Hospital; Jacob*, who used to carry a knife himself; and Graeme Halleron, a Met Police officer working in violence preventionall of their lives are a reminder of the infinite and devastating diameter of a knife.
The mother:
It was a bright and chilly Tuesday afternoon in January 2015, and 17-year-old Shaquan Sammy-Plummer was in good spirits. He had come home from college, Camden’s LaSwap, and was laughing with his mum, Jessica, as he quickly got dressed to head out to work at Waitrose. Shaquan did not make it home that day.
After work, he stopped by a house party in Winchmore Hill, but was turned away at the door by Jemal Williams, who told him it was full, but demanded that Shaquan hand over the drinks and snacks he had brought. Shaquan refused, but made no fuss and walked away. He was only a few doors down when Williams grabbed a knife from the house, chased after Shaquan, and plunged it into his chest.
In the years since Shaquan’s death, Plummer has worked tirelessly to educate young people in London about the dangers of knife crime, speaking in schools on behalf of The Shaquan Sammy-Plummer Foundation, the charity she set up in her son’s name.
‘When I talk to children these days, they say, “There’s nowhere for us to go.” The youth centres have been shut down, so they find themselves outside. And that’s where the problems start.’

Ah, yes. That old chestnut. If only Jamal had had access to a youth club, he wouldn’t have been a short-tempered waste of oxygen, and would have made something of himself, like Shaquan, who, errr, didn’t appear to have had access to a youth club either. At least, it’s not mentioned. 

So, since they were both young black boys, perhaps there’s some other factor at play?

The surgeon:
‘Often it’s over nothing,’ he says, when I ask about what he and St Giles see as common causes of knife attacks. ‘Impulse control, money, prestige. The stimulus can be minimal and the action is horrendous. Occasionally, something more significant, some sort of long, deep-seated issue. But more often than not, it’s trivial — he said this, she said that. A lot of this stuff seems to be an insanely cheap tariff for a life.
‘I don’t lament my choices,’ he says. ‘I’m good at what I do. What I lament is that this is happening in a first-world country with lots of resources. That’s what makes me annoyed.’

Happening in a first world country, yes, but is it happening mainly to first world cultures

The gang member:
‘The first time I carried a knife…’ Jacob pauses for a moment, shifting in his seat. ‘I didn’t even really think about it. I’ve just taken this big kitchen knife, put it down my pants and walked out. And I’m just thinking, “I’m gonna get this guy today. Now.”’ What led to a then 21-year-old Jacob feeling the cool blade of a knife against his thigh, searching the streets of London for its intended target, is both remarkably trivial and incredibly complex. The flashpoint was a petty social media argument about a girl, between his friend and another young man.
A budding rapper, Jacob is now focusing on cultivating his music career, while working in construction on the side. ‘There’s a lot of the mandem that I know on the streets, [who] could have been footballers, doctors, so many things. They had a lot of things going for them, but due to certain circumstances, not having the money… the opportunities… a lot of them are from single-parent homes.
‘If there was more skills in school, if they taught us plumbing, electrics, how to pay your bills, rent, things like that, I feel like kids would be more reluctant to be in the streets because they’d know how to make money in a legal way.
‘Over the years, as I’ve matured, I’ve realised a lot of it is just about wanting acceptance. I think it stems from just being a young kid that wanted to actually have that love that I wasn’t getting.’

Strange that those would be things you’d need school to teach you, isn’t it? I learned them from family life. 

The policeman:
He has been a schools’ officer for the Met for 14 years, delivering workshops to children across east London. Graeme acknowledges that mistrust of the Met, an institution found in last year’s landmark Casey report to be ‘institutionally racist, sexist and homophobic’, is a huge barrier to building relationships with young people. ‘We know young people a lot of young people don’t like the police,’ Graeme tells me. ‘We have the ability to take away liberties. So I understand there’s that negativity.’ The majority of the students at St Edward’s are Black – a community seven times more likely to be stopped and searched by the Met. ‘We do experiences with young people where we switch roles, we get them to put on our kit and say “you be a police officer you do the stop and search”, and they see it from our point of view, and that opens them up to the police a little bit.’

You know, if I was continually butting heads against people who could deprive me of my liberty, I’d stop doing the things that would draw their attention, wouldn’t you?

So what has this ‘deep dive’ really shown us? Over to you, Reader.