You won't see me coming....
H/T: Stephen Brown via email
Maybe the widow[er] was trans?They did spell it correctly in the body of the article however.
How dare you assume the genders of those involved (at that particular moment, maybe he/she/they/them/it 'feels' like both ... and a unicorn on Thursday afternoons).Please report to Re-education Camp 27 forthwith.
"Maybe the widow[er] was trans?"These days, it's probably the answer!"They did spell it correctly in the body of the article however."Yes, any blooper in the headline is invariably not repeated in the body text, and vice versa. "Please report to Re-education Camp 27 forthwith."They've hot a special wing for bloggers!
Post a Comment
3 comments:
Maybe the widow[er] was trans?
They did spell it correctly in the body of the article however.
How dare you assume the genders of those involved (at that particular moment, maybe he/she/they/them/it 'feels' like both ... and a unicorn on Thursday afternoons).
Please report to Re-education Camp 27 forthwith.
"Maybe the widow[er] was trans?"
These days, it's probably the answer!
"They did spell it correctly in the body of the article however."
Yes, any blooper in the headline is invariably not repeated in the body text, and vice versa.
"Please report to Re-education Camp 27 forthwith."
They've hot a special wing for bloggers!
Post a Comment