Barnaby's mum Emma, who spoke on behalf of all three families, told The Mirror: 'We believe what the produced is a very imbalanced documentary – it's shameful, cold, ill-judged, arrogant and thoughtless.' She said watching the BBC’s treatment of the case had made their trauma even worse. The BBC only informed them about the show after they had already filmed it and a fortnight before it was due to be broadcast. Emma also claims that none of the victims families were considered or consulted at any point to be told the show was being made.I see where this bafflement stems from - you consider yourselves, the relatives of those murdered by a mental patient - as the victims of this incident, as everyone else does.
But this is a BBC documentary, and to them, the murderous mental patient and his relatives are the real victims.
They only found out the killers family were being interviewed on camera when they watched the show.
The families are also concerned over claims from Calocane's family that they did not know of his mental health issues until after the stabbings and are demanding to know why BBC Panorama editors chose not to mention the fact that his mother was an NHS nurse.
We all know why, don't we, Reader?
The families tried to reach out to the show's editors to express their concerns but say the responses they got were 'cold' and 'dismissive', forcing them to lodge a formal complaint which has been escalated to the corporation’s highest 'stage two' level and they are now awaiting a response.
They were too busy dealing with the 'Strictly' kerfuffle, clearly...
3 comments:
This mental problems business pisses me off. You have to be a lunatic to do some of these crimes. Like mad dogs, the perpetrators should be put down, lunatic or not. Why should I and other tax payers be robbed to keep them alive.
"claims from Calocane's family that they did not know of his mental health issues until after the stabbings "
Pull the other one. No family member of a person going through such a mental health episode can be that unaware, especially when they are being sectioned and locked up. And I know from personal experience how disturbed a person has to be to get sectioned, merely 'not quite right' doesn't cut it, and family members are usually tearing their hair out trying to get the NHS to do anything. And the BBC's own article on the Calocane case specifically says that his family members tried to alert the mental health team as to his condition: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj08qypl438o
So which is it? We tried to get the NHS to do something, or we din kno nuffin? They can't have it both ways. Or rather they can because the likes of the BBC won't pull them up on it, for all the usual 'diverse' reasons.
"Like mad dogs, the perpetrators should be put down, lunatic or not. "
We don't even put the killer dogs down in all cases!
"Pull the other one. No family member of a person going through such a mental health episode can be that unaware..."
Should have done them for purjury!
Post a Comment