Jean-Paul Jeanrenaud, a former director of WWF who worked for the charity for 27 years, said: “The WWF name, certainly from my experience, had a lot of leverage. If I approached people, they wanted to hear what I had to say … WWF has an influence, and it still has an influence.
“I think the public will be even more than surprised, perhaps shocked. I know that it’s the sort of thing that I have difficulty getting my head around.”
What is 'the sort of thing' he's talking about?
The wildlife charity WWF has been working to support the trade in polar bear fur at the same time as using images of the bears to raise money, it can be revealed.
And if you're shrugging right now, welcome to the club!
Despite their endangered status, polar bears are hunted commercially in Canada, the only country that still allows the practice after it was banned by Russia, Greenland, the US and Norway. An annual average of 300–400 skins are exported, primarily to China, where a full pelt sells for an average of $60,000 (£48,000) and is often used for luxury clothing or as a rug.
And despite all their campaigns, WWF is just fine with this. Because what they decry in public, they support in private. And for good reasons:
A two-year investigation has found that WWF has helped facilitate the international commercial trade in polar bear furs as part of its support for the policy of sustainable utilisation. The idea is that by licensing the exploitation of a small number of animals for economic purposes – such as for fur or trophy-hunting – the status of the species overall will be improved.
WWF has also claimed a ban on the international commercial trade would damage the livelihoods of Indigenous communities.
Never mind the animals, respect the savages!
WWF has made clear statements about its position regarding trophy-hunting and the trade in elephant ivory. It has said it is “not opposed to hunting programmes that present no threat to the survival of threatened species and, where such species are involved, are part of a demonstrated conservation and management strategy that is scientifically based, properly managed, and strictly enforced, with revenues and benefits going back into conservation and local communities”.
WWF said in a 2013 statement: “If, at some stage in the future, polar bear populations become so diminished by climate change and habitat loss, and/or if international trade presents a greater threat, we would want to revisit the Cites listing issue. But we’re not at that point.”
So make hay while the sun shines!
6 comments:
Polar Bears are becoming a pest due to overpopulation. Partially through bans on hunting and partially because there isn't actually any global warming.
Bears in general are attracted to human settlements - not through desperation, but through the availability of all you can eat buffets in trash cans, fridges and the like.
100 years ago, roughly when David Attenborough was born, the total population of polar bears in the Arctic was 7,000.
According to the latest surveys, after a century of environmental pollution, global warming and all our other apparent sins, the total population now stands at 30,000. They're faring quite well, it seems.
Looks like Fox's Glacier Mints won't be running short of wrapper-models anytime soon.
"Despite their endangered status."
They don't have endangered status due to them not being, you know, endangered. Someone has been believing the lies of the Climate Change Lobby.
Stonyground.
Do what I say, not what I do has always been the mantra of the nomenklatura Comrade.
Wot? A hypocritical "charity"? Tell me t'ain't troo!
Tough on polar bears, tough on the causes of polar bears
Jaded
Post a Comment