Missy, an 11 year-old rottweiler sank her teeth into the crook as he reached his hand through the cat flap at the home in Leamington Spa, Warwickshire.
The usually mild-mannered pet did so much damage that police were able to take DNA samples from blood left at the scene - including on Missy's teeth.And even less so when Burglar Bill sues the family for damages.
What? Think it won't happen?
7 comments:
The dog was merely protecting its territory. That's what dogs tend to do. Any civil action against the householder/owner of the dog will fail. Summary justice indeed!
Penseivat
'Any civil action against the householder/owner of the dog will fail.'
Plod-brained, perchance?
Experience of similar incidents, old fruit.
Penseivat
Also, this would be a civil, as opposed to a criminal action and so there would be no 'Plod' involvement (sorry, meant to add this to the last message).
Penseivat
"The dog was merely protecting its territory. That's what dogs tend to do. Any civil action against the householder/owner of the dog will fail."
At the moment, yes (though that's never a certainty).
But if the amendments to the DDA making attacks on private property actionable go through, that won't be the case, as the linked post points out.
"Also, this would be a civil, as opposed to a criminal action and so there would be no 'Plod' involvement.."
Again, only if the DDA proposals aren't adopted. If they are, all bets are off.
We've seen how the police and CPS treat home defenders of the two-legged kind. Anyone think Fido will get a better deal?
Oh look, JuliaM....something to rival the enjoyment of distributing tacks along a busy cycle lane.....the same Police who stood and watched the London riots, find courage to knock individual cyclists to the ground.
Shirley that's A Really Good News Story?
As I squeeze into Lycra and finish my muesli, I bid you an equally exciting day at the key-bored.
We await with bated breath.
Post a Comment