The victim, who was in her 80s, suffered fatal injuries when the 'dangerously out of control' animals - believed to be pit bulls - cornered and attacked her.
An air ambulance was dispatched and landed near her home but she was confirmed dead at the scene.
No, I don't mean attacks on innocent pensioners enjoying some post-lockdown fresh air in their garden when the four-legged weapon dogs of their neighbour maul her to death. That goes without saying, and it seems the police are quite happy to tolerate dangerous dogs in their area.
I mean attacks on the public purse by idiots in blue:
A vet had raced to the scene armed with a tranquiliser to sedate the animals, which have since been seized to establish their breed.
They don't need to be alive for that. What does it even matter, since the new legislation that you supposedly demanded to help 'protect the public' isn't being used anyway?
3 comments:
The police are prepared to tolerate just about anything happening to a member of the public. The object of the exercise for our "police service" is to gather revenue, do nothing that might not be PC and do as little real work as possible. How to get yourself promoted and therefore dig your snout even deeper into the public purse is the name of the game.
If the dogs killed someone you would think that they would be put down immediately, that much surely is an open and shut case. It would be nice to think that establishing the breed would be done so that they could throw the book at the owner. I would have thought that DNA tests could be used to establish dog breeds by now.
"The object of the exercise for our "police service" is to gather revenue, do nothing that might not be PC and do as little real work as possible. "
It's hard not to agree...
"If the dogs killed someone you would think that they would be put down immediately, that much surely is an open and shut case."
You would, wouldn't you? And in a sane world, that's what would happen.
Post a Comment